Does the Bible Say We Should Eat Grains?

does the bible say we should eat grains Does the Bible Say We Should Eat Grains?

I often (ok, basically always) encourage clients to ditch the grains for the sake of their health, and many do see tremendous health improvements by doing so. One question/objection I often get is “If grains are unhealthy, why are they consumed in the Bible and why did Jesus use so many references to Bread” or “Grains are the staff of life, and Jesus even called himself the “Bread of Life” so eating them can’t be bad!”

It is certainly a valid point to consider and as a Christian, it was one I researched while going grain-free. Fortunately, for those of us striving to eat as healthy as possible and to live good Christian lives, the answers aren’t conflicting.

To fully understand the factors involved though, it is important to note several things:

1. The Grains of Biblical Times are Much Different Than The Grains of Today!

There certainly are many references to grains in the Bible, and with good reason. The Bible was compiled during a predominately agricultural time, and this would have been a reference that was easily understood by the people during that time period.

Though the Bible references grains, the grains consumed a couple thousand years ago bear little to no resemblance to the grains we consume (or don’t consume!) today.

In Jesus’ time, there were only three major types of wheat in existence: Einkorn, Emmer and  later Triticum aestivum along with simple, non hybrid varieties of other grains like barley, millet and rye. These grains had (and still have ) a higher protein content and lower antinutrient content than grains of today.

This is a stark contrast to the 25,000+ species that exist today, most of which we created in a lab to be disease resistant or produce high yields. In order to achieve these traits like disease and pest resistance, scientists had to enhance the part of the grains that naturally resists disease and predators: mainly, the glutens, lectins, and phytates- the most harmful parts of the grains to humans.

In addition, these hybridized strains are often allergen producing and usually sprayed with pesticides and chemicals. It is interesting to note that some people who are allergic to modern strains of wheat show little to no reaction to (properly prepared) Einkorn wheat in small amounts.

So, the grains of Jesus’ time weren’t genetically similar to the grains of today, and had lower concentrations of the harmful components. In addition, they were prepared much differently:

2. The Grains of Biblical Times Were Prepared Differently Than The Grains of Today!

Besides the differences in the basic genetic structure of the grains, grains in Biblical times were processed much differently, and consuming them in modern form wouldn’t have even been an option.

Since grains do contain anti-nutrients like gluten, lectin and phytates, these components have to be neutralized somehow. Traditional cultures throughout the world have found ways to lower the effect of these harmful properties.

In Biblical times, grains were often prepared by soaking, fermenting or sprouting before being consumed. Often, this wasn’t intentional, but a result of methods of storage which left the grains exposed to warm, moist conditions that encouraged sprouting and fermentation.

When a grain sprouts, the chemical structure changes and the anti-nutrient content is greatly reduced. Fermentation mitigates this further. Grains are harmful to humans when consumed straight off the plant in an uncooked or un-prepared state.

In addition, any grains consumed in Biblical times could truly have been called “whole grains” unlike the processed granola versions of modern times. Equipment didn’t even exist to grind grain to the micro-fine particles that we call flour today. Grains were often ground, by hand, using stones or similar objects.

Think of the difference in particle size between a hand-ground, sprouted piece of wheat and the dried, hybridized, dust-like flour we use today. The flour we consume today is ground to such a small size that the surface area of the grain is literally increased 10,000% and the starchy area is expanded. As a result, the body quickly converts it to sugar, which is why flour and processed foods can have as much of an impact on the blood sugar as pure sugar can.

Another obvious point to realize is that any reference to grain in Jesus’ time was a reference to an actual grain, in whole form or made into bread (that also wouldn’t resemble the stuff you get at the store!). Certainly, grains in Jesus’ time would not have been made into donuts, pretzels, chips, snack foods, cookies, etc.

Grains in Biblical times also wouldn’t have been mixed with vegetable oils, high fructose corn syrup, chemical additives, commercial yeasts, artificial flavorings, or other ingredients used today. Jesus wouldn’t have been snacking on Chex Mix or chowing down on bagels or soda while he was fishing.

If one truly desires to eat grains because they are referenced in the Bible, than these grains should be one of the three varieties that actually existed in the Bible, and should be prepared in a similar way and eaten in a similar way (though I’m not sure this is what many people are envisioning when referencing the Bible for their reason for consuming grains).

3. Grain Consumption Didn’t Begin Until After the Fall

If you read the text carefully, Adam and Eve are given the plants and fruits to eat in the Garden of Eden when there is peace and optimal health (considering death didn’t enter the picture until after the fall).

It is only after they sin that reference is made to tilling the soil and growing grains, and this reference is mingled with a reference to death when God tells Adam: “From the sweat of your brow shall you get bread to eat, until you return to the ground from which you were taken.”

In this sense, one can wonder if grain consumption was part of God’s plan in the beginning at all. Of course, God created grains, as he created everything, and saw that it all was good. An important distinction to make is that not everything that is “good” is necessarily “beneficial” to the human body.

God created poison ivy, which has its place in the eco-system, but which is not beneficial to the human body. God created many poisonous species of plants and animals, and they are good, though not beneficial to the human person.

God created grains, and while they have been consumed at times throughout history, nowhere is it specifically declared that they are beneficial and healthy for the human body, or that their consumption is part of the optimal diet for humans.

The context of the Bible was an agricultural time period when grains were sometimes necessary for survival or population growth. Especially considering the differences in grains today, it must be evaluated if grains are still a necessary part of the human diet.

In my opinion, references in the Bible give us insight into this as well:

4. Grains Were Often Eaten in Times of Hardship

While grains are referenced often in the Bible, these references are not always positive. From the animal offering of Abel that was preferred to the grain offering of Cain, to the admonition to Adam to till the soil until death, the Bible has its share of negative grain references as well.

The Book of Ezekiel is one of the most detailed and well-known references to grains, as God commands Ezekiel to use  “wheat and barley, and beans and lentils, and millet and spelt” to make a bread for the people to eat.

This “recipe” has gained popularity and a version of bread fashioned after this method can be found in many grocery stores these days. Often, this is assumed to be healthy as it was a recipe given in the Bible. Unfortunately, a few important details were left out:

  • Taken in context, the book of Ezekiel is not a pleasant time. During Chapter 4, there is an impending siege, and these grains are all that is available. In fact, these foods are seen as food for animals, and Ezekiel protests having to eat them.
  • Because of the pending siege and famine, Ezekiel is also told to eat carefully portioned amounts to make sure there is enough food.
  • In verse 12, Ezekiel is commanded to cook this “bread” over human excrement, “For your food you must bake barley loaves over human excrement in their sight, said the Lord.” When Ezekiel protests, God allows him to use cow dung instead…. hardly appetizing, huh?

Other references link grain consumption with hardship as well:

  • When God’s people must leave Egypt in haste , they eat unleavened bread because it is all they can prepare in time
  • In the exile in the desert, God’s people eat Manna from Heaven though they eventually cry out for meat and are given quail
  • During the seven years of famine in Egypt, the Egyptians must eat grains because it is all that is available

[On a side note, both Biblical references and research on mummys from Ancient Egypt show that the Ancient Egyptians consumed grains in relatively large amounts in the form of breads and beer. The ancient Egyptians ate more "whole grains," leaner meat, less saturated fat and more fruits and veggies than the average American today.  According to conventional wisdom, they should have been healthier, but researchers are stumped to find that they had high rates of heart disease and plaque in arterial walls as well.]

5. Meat is Often Linked With Times of Celebration or Redemption

Just as grains are often linked with hardship, many references to meat and fat in the Bible seem to promote their use (which is interesting, because many diets that encourage a Biblical way of eating often minimize meat consumption).

While meat was not specifically named as a food for man in the beginning, after the flood, God told Noah that “Every creature that is alive shall be yours to eat. I give them to you as I did the green plants.”

When the prodigal son returns, the father kills the fatted calf in celebration instead of making a cake or baking some bread.

In the Old Testament, meat sacrifices were often required. In fact, at Passover, the blood of a lamb (foreshadowing Christ) was necessary to save the firstborn sons. The passage makes it very clear that unless the Israelites actually consumed the flesh of the lamb, they would not be protected.

It times of fasting or sacrifice, people in Biblical times (and still today) abstain from meat. From a scientific standpoint, there are health benefits to fasting, especially from occasionally removing proteins and fats for a short time.

Abstaining from meat as a form of fasting (as Catholics still do during Lent and many other religions do at  times as well) shows that meat is something to be enjoyed and consumed!

Jesus As the Bread of Life

Throughout the New Testament, references to bread take on a parallel to Christ himself. Jesus is born in Bethlehem, (translated “House of Bread”). Jesus is laid in a manger, a feeding trough for animals.

Jesus even refers to himself as the “Bread of Life” in the Gospel of John, and He tells us that unless we  “eat His flesh and drink His blood, we shall not have life within us.”

So when Jesus refers to himself in this way, and when we pray for “Our Daily Bread” in the Our Father, are these references an encouragement to consume grains?

I’d say that these references are not meant to be a nutritional directive, but rather to reveal important theological truths. As I mentioned above, there are many references of grain consumption during times of trial and famine.

Bread was consumed during fasting and times of trouble or sacrifice. These references are sprinkled throughout the Old Testament and would have been understood by the Jews during Jesus’ time.

Since Jesus became man to become a sacrifice for our sins, these parallels remind us of the sacrificial role Christ will take on.

Jesus also refers to himself as the “Lamb of God” in the Gospel of John, and these two titles taken together have a lot of meaning. As was foreshadowed in Old Testament Passover, the lamb was slain so that the angel of death would pass over God’s people.

Christ’s sacrifice, the last one needed, offers redemption as He dies for our sins.

Jesus celebrates the Last Supper with his disciples at the time  Passover would have traditionally have been celebrated by the Jewish people. The Last Supper takes place on the feast of unleavened bread, when the sacrificial lamb was typically consumed. Though, the lamb is noticeably absent from the Last Supper.

At the Last Supper, Jesus holds up the bread, saying,  “This is my Body, which is given up for you.” At this central moment, Jesus links the two titles he has called himself, the “Bread of Life” and the “Lamb of God.” The “bread” becomes the “Lamb”, which is to become the sacrifice for all mankind.

The next day, Jesus is crucified and dies at the hour that the sacrificial lamb is usually killed during Passover. All these connections would have had deep meaning to the Jewish people who would have recognized their references in Scripture.

Jesus, as God incarnate, was both the “Bread of Life” sustaining His people in times of trouble and trial, and the “Lamb of God” that takes away the sins of the world.

The references connecting Jesus with “Bread” are very important to the message of His Sacrifice for us. They are not ever presented as a dietary guideline or a mandatory command to consume grains.

Just as vegetarians can avoid meat without worrying about not following the references to meat-eating in the Bible, a Christian can certainly avoid grains without worrying about not following a Biblical directive. Jesus drank wine and his first miracle was turning water into wine, though I’ve never seen anyone argue that it is wrong to avoid drinking because Jesus drank wine.

More importantly, as Christians, we believe that our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit and should be nourished and treated as such. (“Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God?  You are not your own;  you were bought at a price.  Therefore honor God with your body,” (1 Cor. 6:19-20)).

For this reason, it is worth considering for a Christian, if grains in their modern form should even be consumed for those trying to live as healthy as possible out of respect for a body made in the image and likeness of God.

In my opinion, grains certainly can be avoided, and often should be!

The Bottom Line

While there was perhaps a time in history when smaller amounts of grains, properly prepared, could be consumed without damaging the body, this is not the case today.

As mentioned above, grains today are much different than those of Biblical times. Many studies are now linking consumption of modern grains to inflammation, arterial plaque, joint problems, arthritis, infertility, PCOS and many other conditions.

Celiac disease, gluten intolerance, Type II Diabetes, Heart Disease and Cancer are all on the rise. Even small children are showing signs of insulin resistance and obesity. As a whole, our society suffers from damaged metabolisms and impaired insulin function.

The modern diet, especially in the last half a century has created a society of largely overweight people with health problems. Almost half of all people will die of heart disease, and consumption of grains, especially in processed form, has been linked to heart disease. (For a funny and factual explanation of why, watch the movie Fat Head if you haven’t already!)

For those who still want to consume grains in Biblical fashion, I suggest finding one of the three original strains, taking special care to prepare them by sprouting, fermentation or both, and eating them in moderate amounts along with a lot of veggies and meat.

For me, I don’t feel as well with any grain consumption, even correctly prepared, and the time needed for proper preparation just isn’t worth it. There are many other sources of nutrition that can be eaten in the whole form God gave us, without the need to process or even cook before eating.

Calorie for calorie, meats, fats and vegetables are much better (and more bio-available!) sources of nutrients, without the harmful anti-nutrient content.

For the small percentage of people who can tolerate grains without ill health effect, moderate grain consumption might be ok. The rest of us should consider the potential negative effects.

Many people will continue to eat grains, even in light of the emerging evidence, and this is certainly their right and prerogative. Heck, if a person wants to eat only Cheetos and Pepsi for the rest of their life (however short it may be!), that is his decision. My hope is just that Biblical references to grains won’t be used to justify eating processed flours and foods that are nothing like the actual grains of Biblical times.

What’s your opinion? How do you think Biblical teaching fits in to grain-free eating (or doesn’t fit)? Weight in below!

[Note: I've seen several other bloggers bring up this issue as well and noticed hateful and belittling comments towards the bloggers and commenters who are also Christian. If you don't believe in God or the Bible, this post is obviously not written to try to influence you, so please avoid any demeaning comments!]

Like What You Read?

Sign up for exclusive Wellness Mama updates to get my newsletter, coupon codes, & bonuses emailed FREE! (No spam ever, I promise!)

About Wellness Mama

Wellness Mama is a full-time housewife with a background in nutrition, journalism and communications. Her passion is helping others achieve optimal health through a “Wellness Lifestyle.” She has helped hundreds of clients lose weight, increase athletic performance, improve fertility, and overcome numerous health problems and diseases. Connect with her on Twitter, Facebook, Google+, & Pinterest.

Disclaimer: Many of the links on my site, especially those from Amazon, Mountain Rose Herbs, Tropical Traditions and OraWellness are affiliate links. Should you click on these links and decide to purchase anything, I will receive a small commission and you will have my sincere thanks for supporting Wellness Mama!

DISCLAIMER: The statements made here have not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. These statements are not intended to diagnose, treat or cure or prevent any disease. This notice is required by the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

  • Piecesofsunshine

    Thank you, a very interesting breakdown on the topic.

  • Lynn

    Wow – very best explanation I’ve seen ever!! Thank you so much for this (and I just quickly scanned it). Can’t wait to break this down even further. So appreciate all you do.

  • Joanna

    Hi, I just wanted to let you know I really enjoyed this article. I have often wondered about this, and have a loaf of the “Old Testament” bread in my freezer. I will keep it for when bread and butter seems to be just the thing I want. You saved me some Biblical research with your explination. It warms my heart that you are a Christian. I just found your blog and have enjoyed reading it. Just pulled it up this morning to find a recipe and found this great post

  • Cluvrt

    Thank you! Very well written explanations! I just love your posts!

  • Stephanie

    Awesome post! I whole heartedly agree with your points. Context is everthing.

  • Joelle

    Thank you! This is the best and most thoughtful article I have read on this subject. I so appreciate your explanations!

  • theresa

    i’ve been waiting for this post! thanks – very helpful!

  • Leslie

    Wow!! Great post!!

  • http://8littlearrows.wordpress.com/ Colleen

    Katie, thanks for this explanation. I have been wondering about all this. It makes a lot of sense to me. Honestly, there are only two reasons we are still eating grains: time and money. With our family size, it’s been exremely hard to afford the grain-free lifestyle, and with homeschooling and caring for kids, trying to cook three meals a day has been pretty taxing as well. However, we have definitely seen the health benefits of going mostly grain-free and try to at least soak most of our grains. Looking forward to summer when veggies will be cheaper and we can grow some of our own. Thanks for all the great recipes and info.

  • Knorris47

    Thank you so much. This morning I was talking with a friend about Eziekel bread and Jesus being the Bread of Life and wondering if I was wrong not eating bread. I pretty much had come to the conclusion that we, as humans, are not evolving, which I don’t believe anyway, but devolving. There have been studied showing that what a mother ate prior to and during pregnancy effects the health of a child and since I know my mom was a person who ate bread and butter covered with sugar as a snack to me it wasn’t a surprise I’m diabetic! Lol but now I have a better explanation. The wheat devolved! Tho we could have too. Thanks again so much. I will be a regular reader! Karen

  • Grammyco

    Wellness Mama, So glad to know you’re a Christian!! Until recently I never thought too much about grains pro or con. As I stated after the 40 day fast, I do feel much better grain free. I do toast the commercial Ezekiel Bread to have with a cup of tea(comfort food) often. However, that is the most of my grain intake. I gave up pastas, etc. some time ago and consider them poison. Thank you for being there and a reasonable voice of advice on proper nutrition. I appreciate your input on Facebook, as well I visit your website from time to time for information and/or receipes. May God continue to give you wisdom and favor.

  • MissT

    What are your sources for this article? I would like to read into this further.

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to find any actual sources that delve
    into this much. All of my biblical references come from the New
    American Bible, and most of my health references are either from
    scientific databases or articles (with sources) that I’ve compiled at
    http://wellnessmama.com/wellness-101. There are opinions all over the
    board on this issue, and many sources who argue that we should eat
    grains because of biblical references (though they typically
    discourage alcohol and meat- also both referenced in the Bible).
    I wish there were more compiled sources for this topic, but this
    article was largely my own health research combined with Biblical
    references. I would like to expand on this in the future in more
    detail though!

  • Charlotte

    This is one of the most interesting posts I’ve read all week. As a Christian, I’ll admit that I struggle with this aspect of grain-free advocacy. It’s not very popular to voice this opinion however so I never really got any satisfactory answers to it. This was wonderful! I found point #3 particularly interesting. Thank you so much for this!

  • Missysoupy

    Very interesting topic. I do find it odd that so many people say “Well, they eat bread in the bible!” while choking down their pork chops & sea scallops. If people were really concerned about what the bible thought about diet, would they really be eating pork rinds? I think we too often use the word of God to justify what we WANT to do/say/eat, rather than aligning our actions with those of Jesus Christ.

    Thank you for writing this post. I, too, like the reference to the Fall (because there was to be no death in the garden, A & E weren’t even eating meat! Not that I advocate a vegetarian diet, but it is a beautiful illustration of God’s intent and reverence for life).

  • JH

    Well done! So refreshing to read this amidst a sea of evolutionary-based paleo blogs.

    In Him…

  • Patti Spice

    So happy to have stumbled upon your site. I am a “wellness” person and have been gluten free for over four years because I have Celiac Disease. I knew the Biblical grains were clean, gf, etc., but have been wishing for an article/information such as this for quite sometime. I have “shared” this on my fb page as I am affiliated with a “superstar” wellness company and have many affiliates and friends who will be interested in this article as well! Thank you for shedding some light where there is terrific darkness…grains!!

  • Hannah

    Wow, what a great post! I am so glad I stumbled onto your blog! This was by far one of the best biblical posts about the grain free way of life so many of us have chosen I think you did a wonderful job. I look forward to reading more on your blog, and i will definitely pass this post on to some family and friend of mine!

  • Megan

    Daniel 1:8-16

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    Definitely an interesting passage. Unfortunately, we don’t get a
    solid description of what the “royal food” was. It could likely have
    been foods rich in honey, whole grains and beer to drink, as there is
    archeological proof that these foods were consumed in babylon at the
    time. I’ve heard this used to justify a vegetarian diet, and while it
    definitely suggest vegetables should be eaten (and I agree) it
    doesn’t say that Daniel and his companions ate grains. A ten day
    water and veggie fast can be very cleansing, so its logical that they
    looked healthier after 10 days. My guess would be that some of the
    royal foods that were offered were foods considered unclean according
    to levitical law, which is the reason Daniel didn’t want to eat them.
    Interesting passage to consider though.. thanks for commenting!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Witt-Rick/100002368717513 Witt Rick

    From an old school altar boy I appreciate when someone puts together such a wealth of information. A nod to Marksdailyapple.com for getting me here. I’ve sent this link to a lot of my wife’s friends. I believe today one of the seven deadly sins should be…glutenny. Thanks again

  • Pingback: 7 Quick Takes Friday (vol. 126) | Conversion Diary

  • Pingback: Bread in the Bible « What did I learn today?

  • http://knowledgehungry.wordpress.com/ Jeanne G. @knowledgehungry

    Sorry I’m late to the party. I came here from Jen Fulweiler’s Conversion Diary blog. I agree with the nutritional ideas that you describe in this article, but I don’t think I agree with some of your Biblical assumptions. I wrote an essay explaining what I think in my own blog at http://wp.me/plGeP-3P. Please excuse me, I love your website, but I just didn’t agree with some of the things you wrote here.

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    Thanks for reading and for taking the time to answer in such depth!
    I’m always glad to hear other opinions, especially ones that are so
    well thought out as yours.

    I actually agree with you on a lot of your points. Certainly, the
    Bible was written during an agricultural time, and references to
    grains sprinkle both the mentions of food people ate, and the
    parables used by Christ. Logically, if grains were a common food
    (though I still maintain not an optimal one :-) these references
    would have been familiar to the people.

    For the reference to seed bearing plants in Genesis, I can definitely
    see either interpretation being correct. By including this passage, I
    was mainly attempting to highlight that there was no explicit mention
    of grain consumption until after the fall, at which time God told
    Adam that he would have to till the soil by the sweat of his brow.
    I’d certainly love to know for sure if grains were eaten and in what
    form before the fall, but my opinion would be that if they were eaten
    before the fall, it would have been in extremely small amounts, since
    they had not yet been given the command to till the soil and
    cultivate them yet. Also, wild growing varieties of grains would have
    given very little actual seed and required much work to harvest, so
    it would seem logical that Adam and Eve would have opted for easier
    forms of nourishment that didn’t require so much work to harvest
    (fruits, nuts, vegetables, etc). You make an interesting point
    though… I wish we could know for sure!

    Great point on #6. I agree completely that this passage isn’t meant
    to endorse a vegetarian diet, but is referencing their faithfulness
    to their covenant with God. You explain it very well!

    The topic of primitive societies is definitely an interesting one,
    and one I’m hoping to get more in depth with at some point. I’d agree
    that many societies have eaten grains of some form, for at least the
    last couple thousand years, but as with the difference in Biblical
    grains, I would assume that the grains eaten thousands of years ago
    wouldn’t necessarily resemble the grains being consumed today.

    So in general, it sounds like we agree that:
    -Even though grain consumption was common in the Bible, the grains
    were different than our modified versions today, and just because
    something was done commonly in Biblical times, this does not
    necessarily mean it should be our nutritional prescription today.
    -Jesus never commands consumptions of grains, for health reasons or
    for salvation.
    -At least in the New Testament, many references to grains serve not
    only as a reference of food eaten at that time, but as a parallel to
    Christ who is our sustenance, our “daily bread,” though this
    reference makes sense because they did consume bread at this point

    Anyway, thanks for taking the time to read and analyze so thoroughly!
    I can definitely see the logic in your points. I’m also enjoying
    browsing your blog! Have a great weekend :-)

  • Pat

    I’m trying to eat a grain-free diet.  It is difficult though.  Grains do not make me feel sick in any way.  Does that mean that they are not harmful to me?  However, I have noticed that after a week of no gluten, my knees don’t ache and after two weeks, my face looks slimmer.  So, is it the gluten or perhaps the sugar in the gluten-filled food that makes the difference?

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    There are a lot of links between grains and inflammation, and some
    doctors who suspect that the autoimmune connection with grains might
    be the cause of a lot of joint pain, arthritis, etc. The sugar could
    come into play also, but even the grains themselves create a
    substantial insulin reaction in the body, so after a couple of weeks
    without them, the body would start to become more insulin sensitive,
    and drop water weight.
    There is certainly increasing evidence that even for those who don’t
    have any gastro symptoms, grains can be harmful.

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    There are a lot of links between grains and inflammation, and some
    doctors who suspect that the autoimmune connection with grains might
    be the cause of a lot of joint pain, arthritis, etc. The sugar could
    come into play also, but even the grains themselves create a
    substantial insulin reaction in the body, so after a couple of weeks
    without them, the body would start to become more insulin sensitive,
    and drop water weight.
    There is certainly increasing evidence that even for those who don’t
    have any gastro symptoms, grains can be harmful.

  • Mimitant

    this is so good…thanks 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Deborah-Horvath-Rowden/1423872989 Deborah Horvath Rowden

    Well done, Wellness Mama! Best article yet in defense of biblical grains versus modern grains! I gave up eating white sugar and grains that aren’t soaked or fermented a year ago and lost 28 lbs so far, no more joint pain or stiffness and my skin looks great! I am 58 and have never been healthier! Thank you again for such a great post!

  • LT

    It seems that you should be careful to make a stronger distinction between processed grains and whole grains. I live as an expat in a place where whole grains are regularly consumed and I eat much, much healthier here than in the US (and I eat fairly healthy in the US). And I feel great.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Marina-Bershadski/696550239 Marina Bershadski

    this is such an interesting post!!! 

  • Pingback: Links I Love {Vol.6}

  • Bobbi Dunn

    Well said! Thanks for taking the time to research this and provide another point of view.

  • Kristina

    Wow, you answered so many questions and brought to mind so much more! Thank you for writing this!

  • Thechubbygrl

    This is simply the best thing I’ve read in such a long time.  Though I’ve never even thought to compare not eating grains to anything biblical I love that you took the time to do all that research.  It’ll come in handy if I get challenge by a crazy grain eating Christian at church :P

  • Dotty

    I’m glad to read your post about how bread is seen or used in the Bible as well. There are other references to bread, too, as in Jesus breaking bread with his disciples.  It did seem to be an important part of their meals, though it was probably a different kind of bread than what we have today.  It has become common for people to grind their grain and bake their own bread today, at least in some homeschooling families.  I thought I was doing a good thing for our family, only to realize that this didn’t help our health much, though it was still better than eating a lot of processed junk from the store or a fast food restaurant.  We had things somewhat backwards, trying to save money by not buying much meat and eating lots of grains and potatos.  I’m now eating only the grains which are gluten free and low in phytic acid, and hope to stick with that.  I’m soaking them before cooking and eating lots of veggies and eggs, kefir, and pastured meat when we can get it. Thanks for your help in changing to a healthier way of eating.

  • Pingback: BREAD (Our Father, Word by Word) : Conversion Diary

  • Terri

    When eating grain-free, do you skip the communion of the Lord’s table? Our church serves wine with communion and even those who do not partake of alcohol DO take the small amount served at the Lord’s table. I am just curious what others do, no need to respond if it’s too personal. Thanks.

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    I receive communion, though if I were ever diagnosed with Celiac
    disease or other allergic condition, I would just receive the
    precious blood, and not the bread.

  • Theresa

    I am very fortunate to belong to a church that allows me to bring my own gluten free bread/cracker. Pastor Michael blesses it as I hold it to avoid cross contamination. Some churches are not as understanding. If this were the case or when I don’t have my own I also receive the blood and not the bread.  When I first went grain free I would partake of both and deal with feeling bad for awhile but the longer I have been grain free the more severe my reaction to “glutening” has become. Effects usually last for a good 3 weeks now so I’m afraid a weekly exposure would be accumulative. 

  • Pingback: What does the Bible say about Grains? | Living Well…

  • Jerabisar

    Thanks for your explanation of the different types of grains from then to now. I agree the grains we have today (and actually all the food we have today) are not the way God intended them to be. We have pretty much drained all nutrition from the food and soil. I don’t agree that they didn’t consume grains regularly in Bible times though. Even Jesus walked through a field and ate the wheat directly off the stalk. He didn’t soak it first or anything. Perhaps we should focus on what God specifically said not to eat. Like Pork, animal fat, shellfish, etc. 

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    Those things “pork, animal fat and shellfish” were prohibited by old testament Levitical law, which Christians are no longer bound by as they new covenant through Christ overruled it.

  • mystic

    A great exposition of the law can be found in James Dunn book – The theology of Paul the apostle. the law became the law of the spirit on fleshly tablets of the heart. Also know that wine has the same greek word as grape juice(the good wine) in the new testament. And the verse that says all foods sanctified by the word of God — (sanctified means set apart) – is a reference to all the kosher foods set apart by the word of God). Pork has never been set apart by the word of God, so eat kosher. And by the way great info’. The seventh day adventists can help you on these topics also, their theology is based on kosher and brings many things to light in addition to james dun’s book.  james.a.duke leading worlds herbalist (author of dukes medicinal plants of the bible) may shed more light on grains for you as well as amazon.com

  • Pingback: Primal eating and Christianity | Mark's Daily Apple Health and Fitness Forum page 4

  • Joelle

    We have so many people in our church that are wheat or gluten sensitive and intolerant, we serve a GF version.  Amazingly enough, our church is rather small compared to most.   I live in a rural community, so to have this many people have a problem is crazy, and we joke that this is contagious = )

  • Joelle

    I’m still not so keen on the pork, animal fat and shellfish.  I use pork on ocassion, but the others just don’t make me feel so great. Not to mention, the thought of what are contained in these things (even the pork unless I know what it has been feed) – to me – are just gross.    = P  This is great article and I would love to learn more about this!   I was attempting a raw food diet, and it wasn’t jiving with what my beliefs were, but it raised so many questions about how we came to eat the foods we do – including blubs and tubers.  And where I have been reading so much (and my own experience) with grains, I really wondered how they fit in biblically.  Thanks for the insight!

  • bozini

    So I guess you don’t think much of Dr. Caldwell Esseyltyn, John McDougalls plant based diet that has whole grains as a staple. They’ve done the studies on how a low fat and no meat diet has REVERSED heart disease. You stress eat plenty of vegetables and meat? Nothing is wrong with the vegetables. Meat eaten in moderation is ok — grass fed beef, chicken, and wild fish. So if I eat a bowl of old fashioned or steel cut oats with fruit for breakfast, have brown rice and veggies for lunch, and for dinner — maybe some millet and beans with a salad. So I guess that diet just might clog my arteries? I would have been better off having some meat for the morning, some meat at lunch, some meat at night with a whole lot of veggies and fruit in between and I’ll be okay? Read Dr. McDougall and Esseyltns books and see what the studies have proven.

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    I have read those books and they truly are not backed by science but rather by strong opinions and flimsy scientific references. Low fat and no fat is ok once and a while for a short time, as is complete fasting (which I prefer, and which is also low-fat/no-fat btw). If
    you eat a bowl of oats for breakfast, brown rice for lunch and
    veggies and millet for dinner you are going to have quite a jacked insulin response, not to mention a big dose of phytic acid to help erode your bones. Yes, a low fat diet full of lots of vegetables can reduce some of the risk factors for heart disease (though it might), but so can a high fat diet without excess carbs and grains. Your vegetarian diet may not clog your arteries, but it can cause weight gain, put you at risk for diabetes and lead to hormone imbalance (since fats are necessary for hormone production). And, yes, you
    would be better off eating meat and only meat at all three meals, or even meat with veggies, or even pure Lard (read Good Calories, Bad Calories for this explanation). I wouldn’t include “a whole bunch of fruit” though, because there is that big dose of sugar again.
    I have read the books you recommend, I suggest Protein Power by the Drs Eades, everything by Gary Taubes, watching the movie Fat Head and then getting back to me. Bad science has “proven” what you are promoting, but the true evidence doesn’t back it up. Maybe also check out The Vegetarian Myth and Denise Minger’s blog while you are at it!

  • Cervantesbunch

    Loved this!!!  It confirms everything we’ve been feeling.  And whenever I get an urge to eat bread, I remember that Jesus is my bread of Life

  • Pingback: Christian Primal | Mark's Daily Apple Health and Fitness Forum page 11

  • Pingback: Jesus ate grains, they can’t be bad! Can they? | Fight Together Fitness

  • Rosee Frugal

    Thank you!  This really answered some questions about going grain free that have been nagging me for a long time.  Great blog.  Can’t wait for the feeds!

  • http://twitter.com/bubsandscrubs Brenda

    Your post was just was I was looking for.  I too was really struggling with the Biblical perspective on “bread”, “manna”, etc. and you broke it all down so eloquently and logically.  Thanks for doing the research and presenting it back to your readers so thoroughly.  On that note, I’ll continue to abstain from the grain with a clear conscious.  Thank you!

  • Schooldaze

    Hey, nice blog! It’s late so I don’t have time to read all the comments, but I wanted to say you made some great points, however I’d like to encourage you to revisit a couple of things. You said it would be harmful for humans to eat grains uncooked, however Yeshua (Jesus) and his disciples are critized for walking through a field of grains on the Sabbath as the disciples were plucking the grain and eating it, so it does not appear that it was harmful to them. Also, Ezekiel had to prepare that bread mixture for himself, not the people, as he was demonstrating what was coming for Israel (hunger, rations, etc). It is likely that particular mixture was used as it was very healthy and nutritious and he was not allowed to eat anything else during that time. You are right about the coarseness of the grain being much different, and I found a verse that mentions “you wouldn’t grind your grain down to a powder” so that tells me the grains we do eat should be a much coarser grind, like you were saying, stone ground, not like what we have today.  Again, good job, but check out those points!

  • Schooldaze

    I know it’s hard for Christian’s to consider follwing the Biblical guidelines for eating, but if people could put aside firmly held doctrines and look at the issue scientifically, they would be better able to see the benefits in keeping a Biblically Kosher Diet-no scavengers, no animal fat, if meat is eaten, the animals themselves are vegetarians. Try not to think “Law” but rather instructions-that’s really what the word “Torah” means, it’s about teaching, guiding, instructing, because the Creator knows best.

  • Heather

    Thanks for sharing this!

  • DSR

    you use several of the Bible verses out of context and you ignore several others that would contradict your point (as Schooldaze mentioned). Typical example of eisegesis instead of exegesis. Ex.: the 1 Cor passage to honor God with our body is in the context of sexual immorality, not food. You also need to brush up of Biblical cultural background knowledge. What you mentioned about the grains of biblical time being different from today’s grains can be applied to ALL vegetables, fruits, and meat today. In a word, you really did not convince me. I respect your personal conviction about grains but please, do respect the Bible for what it truly says, not what you want it to say.

  • DSR

    biased information, not well researched on the Bible

  • DSR

    I read in your blog: “Wellness Mama is a full-time housewife with a background in nutrition, journalism and communications.” All what we know is your first name and you do not give us any of your credentials. What degree in nutrition do you have? Any degree at all?

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    Yes, all foods are slightly different in that they have cross pollinated and created hybrids, however, some, like wheat, corn, etc have been specifically modified in labs or selectively bred to have very high gluten or lectin content because this makes them more favorable for baking. They are also processed much differently: ground into very fine flour and bleached instead of sprouted, soaked and fermented. From a nutritional perspective, there is nothing present in grains that can’t be obtained in higher amounts from other foods, and truly no dietary need for grains. The passages I listed and the historical context I talked about can definitely be applied to the decision to eat grains or not. It was not my intent to convince everyone who reads this that the Bible specifically forbids eating grains (obviously it doesn’t) but rather to show that the Bible does not in fact command the eating of grains in these passages, as many Christians assume. I get a lot of emails from people who don’t want to eat grains and feel better without them but wonder if they should still eat them from a Biblical perspective. My point was to help those people understand that the Bible does not require eating grains, and that even if it did, the ones talked about in the Bible wouldn’t be available today. If you don’t personally want to consume grains, I completely respect that decision, but in my experience, many people see health improvements from removing grains from their diet, and my blog is meant to serve as a support system for those who choose this way of eating.

  • Kendra

    This is an excellent post and I thank you for your time and effort to post it. I have often wondered/struggled with this exact issue and you’ve answered several of my questions! 

  • Levi

    Actually the bible days breads strengthens a mans heart, so it does says its healthy and subsequentally
    bread Is healthy for the heart. The bible says not to mingle seed which we have done to make modern wheat. Just get yourself some einkorn flour and make your own breaded goods. Read wheat belly… Einkorn doesnt have the other neurological effects of modern grains.

  • rejoines_931

    ABSOLUTELY wonderful!!! i enjoyed all of it but i disagree with the wine part (if I may without offense) - old testament drinking was allowed with jesus bc he hadnt given himself up yet and still under old law til the cross (titus explains sober minds further i believe)….but other than that I am so happy about this  article i could kiss you :) just kidding. I am new to the whole “whole grains unnecessary” world and needed to investigate – this is articulate and includes biblical references which i always love! well done!
    Rejoines_931

  • http://www.facebook.com/leslie.diffin Leslie Diffin

    Every meal of the Bible, except manna, consisted of bread. Three meals a day, 365. Grains. They haven’t evolved any more than animals, which were eaten on special occasions or high holy days, only. If you value your health and faith, research for yourself.  Without ANY degree in nutrition or  basis in theology, this person is changing the Bible to encourage her style of eating. Deceitful, at the very least.  Be very careful in your choices. She is unable or unwilling to even describe a legitimate credential.

  • Pingback: Top 10 Reasons to Eat Grains | The Liberated Kitchen, LLC

  • Lf555555

    I think anything Jesus ate with his people especially the APOSTLES IS GOOD PERIOD He would never cause any type of harm through food or anything else  to them or his own body. Just common sense. We can’t even imagine that kind of love. Whether eatin in hard times or not. Ezekiel  you quoted  4:12 is a symbolic action, warning prophecy against unfaithful Judah & Jerusalem. But yes todays food is so poisoned w/pesticides etc. Mainly, I believe 1 reason so many probs (allergies,celiac) that we don’t eat wheat in moderation since gov subsidizes wheat & corn it’s in everything  we eat sadly.

  • Pingback: Oh, for the Love of Bread! « Jen Busy Bee

  • Tanya

     But what the bible truly says is how an individual/group interprets it – that’s why there are so many different religions all based on the bible… are the Amish right, the Catholics, Protestants, Latter Day Saints an on and on and on…………… so really it kind of IS what you want it to say depending on WHO you are.

  • Pingback: How do you explain this to someone who thinks the world was created 4000bc? - Page 5 | Mark's Daily Apple Health and Fitness Forum page 5

  • Pingback: Healthful Inspirations » Why Is Everyone Gluten Free All Of A Sudden?

  • Pingback: ‘but what about the bread Jesus ate?’ « patricia linkous

  • jessicadh

    I found you because I googled “grain free” and Bible. I have been thinking more and more about going Paleo or at least Primal, but both of those theories are thoroughly ensconced in the evolutionary model, which of course, I don’t agree with.  I keep saying to myself, Adam’s son was a grain farmer (as is my husband, also cattle) so He would have made different choices if we weren’t meant to have grain right? It’s a tough topic.  I have seen a lot of people see a lot of benefit from going grain free…of course it’s just a hard decision (and a lot of work). I really appreciated your information.

  • NinjaMama

    Every meal in the bible consisted of bread. Made with grains. Every one. Read your bible like it was intended, instead of like a web site terms of use agreement and you would know that for yourself. This person has no actual biblical knowledge and takes things out of context for her own purposes. She has no verifiable credential in nutrition Do not base your health or Christianity on her prejudiced opinions. Study. Be healthy and don’t depend on an imposter to keep your body and soul well.

  • Tina Daum

    Hello,
    I really got what you were saying about everything and also believe in the Fat Head theory.
    I would like to know what you would suggest to replace bread?

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    Meats, Veggies, healthy fats (like coconut) etc. You can also make breads from coconut or almond flour, but they aren’t quite the same…

  • frank

    I disagree about “Healthy Fats” , we are supposed to eat saturated fats. Yes they are good for us if you are not eating grains to get your carbs from.  Our body burns fat that we eat and saturated fat is better for you than mono.  Butter, bacon, red meat, etc… they are all good to eat when you are not on grains.

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    I absolutely agree… this blog is definitely pro saturated fat! :-)

  • Ryan W

    Great post!  And great comments too!  

    In the past few years I’ve been experimenting with ‘macrobiotics’ and the results have been incredible!  I was diagnosed with Asthma at the age of one, and I’ve also had frequent issues with allergies and eczema.  After modifying my regular diet, working toward following macrobiotic guidelines, and applying some ‘home remedies’, I no longer have issues with any of these things.  The interesting thing about it is that macrobiotics promotes a diet consisting primarily of whole grains.Check out “The Book of Macrobiotics,” by Michio Kushi.  It’s a very interesting read, and I’ve found it to be invaluable.  Grains evolved parallel to humans, just as fruits, nuts, and seeds evolved parallel to apes.  Organisms do not develop independently in this world – all life is co-dependent.  The ‘modern diet’ consists of far too many ‘dead’ and artificially produced foods, whereas most of all life feeds off of natural ‘living’ foods.  I agree that grains must be properly prepared (as with any food), and those which are highly processed or artificially derived are of little to no benefit.  However, I wouldn’t go so far as to rule out grains entirely.  Jesus always made reference to things on a number of levels by speaking in parables, however this does not mean that the literal meaning is not just as important as the symbolic.

  • Joelle

    If Jesus symbolically referred to himself as the Bread of Life – it must be pretty important stuff.  I personally cannot have too much grain and definitely not wheat.  i use a little rice, but mostly I use millet, buckwheat, and quinoa – which I guess are technically not grains anyway.

  • 2sissies

    I’ve been wheat/gluten/yeast/starch free for almost 6 months and DO NOT MISS any of it! I have lost weight, do not have as many allergies, more energy, feel good! Eat much more healthily & closer to basics. Love it!

  • Tangotiff69

    I agree. Grains are a carbohydrate that can become food for fungi and molds when stored in dark, moist, warm places, like silos. Fungi, yeasts, and molds can penetrate the cell wall of any cell in the human body! They get into the mitochondria and alter how the cell functions. Essentially they can act as a virus! Their primary food source is carbohydrates, like grains. Their waste product is a form of sterol or cholesterol. Which would explain why all of the statin drugs that were formulated by drug companies were originally formulated to be anti-fungal drugs. But, when they saw as a side effect, they were lowering cholesterol, they decided to market them as cholesterol lowering drugs

  • Funkegbenga

    Wow,this is quite insightful and inspiring.God bless you and I pray that the work of God in your hands will advance the Kingdom of God and depopulate the kingdom of darkness in Jesus name.

  • Lorraine

    Well I’m pretty sure God isn’t thrilled with the fact thatwe  constantly kill animals, I think He’d rather we eat bread, anything but hurt all those animals

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    I’m curious what theology or bible verses you got this impression from…

  • Dave W Palmer

    Sad to hear that some will readily hurl insults at us but then persecution, demeaning comments and the berating of Christians has been that way since Christ came and did what He did for us. Here is a very historical representation of wheat and how is has been genetically modified into a gluten enriched dwarf plant with higher yields than the einkorn and emmer wheats of Christ’s time. I am reading a fantastic book by Dr. Willian Davis called “Wheat Belly” and he has done his homework and presents a fantatic book on issues that possibly could change the way we eat in the future. When I mentioned history earlier; Is it not amazing how any other written document from the past is taken almost verbatim as gospel?!?, that is exactly how it happened and is exactly what is taught as historic fact…yet, when it comes to the Bible, Holy Scriptures, the Gospels…as witnessed, recorded and written by not just one but several people who actually walked with, discussed and learned from Christ, isn’t it amazing how millions will not believe.
    Sad but factual and their final demise will be of their own making.
    Be well,
    Godspeed,
    Dave.

  • guest

    Thank you so much for this information! I thought I was the only one who actually wondered about how grains could be bad when the bible clearly talks about grains for food. This makes so much sense. Thanks!

  • Tara

    You do realize that the temple of God was a total animal bloodbath, by his own prescription?…..not to say that it isn’t sad when an animal dies, or that we shouldn’t be respectful of the animals we use for food, but God commanded his people to slaughter animals for him.

  • Servant

    1 Timothy chapter 4 King James Version

    8 For bodily exercise profiteth
    little: but godliness is profitable unto all things, having promise of
    the life that now is, and of that which is to come.
    9 This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptation.

    ….4 For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:5 For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.

    1 Now the
    Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart
    from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of
    devils; 2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;…..
    6 If thou
    put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shalt be a good
    minister of Jesus Christ, nourished up in the words of faith and of good
    doctrine, whereunto thou hast attained.

    God Bless

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=79102878 Andrea Caballeros

    you are awesome! :) I love the way you see life. You inspire me!

  • MissyRez

    I would say, though, that modern grain is hardly the “creature of God” in once was but an organism so changed by human intervention in its breeding and selection as to be more like Frankenstein’s monster. If, as the author suggests, one wishes to consume grain the way God made it, one would have to limit oneself to the varieties that have been preserved relatively unchanged from thousands of years ago. We can see that the earth and it’s creatures have suffered from the “improvements” man has introduced since “the fall”.

  • MissyRez

    Based on what I read, God does love and care for all His creatures, but for mankind above all. If He required animal sacrifice as far back as Abel (and He himself sacrificed animals to cover Adam and Eve) it was because the nature of fallen humanity needed it, perhaps as a reminder of the high cost of sin. If he added meat to the food allowed to mankind as far back as Noah, it was because the nature of fallen humanity needed it, perhaps due to the destruction wrought by flood which was in turn due to the destruction wrought by man’s sin. One day we are promised a return to a (third) earth in which all animals are again vegetarian. But this is only after a destruction of this present earth by fire in response to the culmination of sin in the end times, the rejection of Christ’s reign on earth at the end of a thousand years. But in the meantime, what you choose to eat is up to you, as long as you temper in with your love of others and sensitivity to their consciences. (Romans 14:21)

  • Cassandra

    Have you not read the sections of leviticus that describe in detail how to sacrifice animals for nearly every sin committed? There is much slaughtering of animals and dripping and splattering their blood on the alter and on the people’s clothes, and burning the fat and other body parts upon the alter. It was all something that, if someone was found to be doing so nowadays in their backyard, would seem to be devil worship or witchcraft or some such.
    Here is just one of the sections I found that mention the blood sprinkling and fat and flesh burning, but there was more than just this section that included all that, there was even a part they sprinkled the blood on their clothes:
    Leviticus chapter 9:
    8 Aaron therefore went unto the altar, and slew the calf of the sin offering, which was for himself.
    9 And the sons of Aaron brought the blood unto him: and he dipped his finger in the blood, and put it upon the horns of the altar, and poured out the blood at the bottom of the altar:
    10 But the fat, and the kidneys, and the caul above the liver of the sin offering, he burnt upon the altar; as the Lord commanded Moses.
    11 And the flesh and the hide he burnt with fire without the camp.
    12 And he slew the burnt offering; and Aaron’s sons presented unto him the blood, which he sprinkled round about upon the altar.
    13 And they presented the burnt offering unto him, with the pieces thereof, and the head: and he burnt them upon the altar.
    14 And he did wash the inwards and the legs, and burnt them upon the burnt offering on the altar.
    15 And he brought the people’s offering, and took the goat, which was the sin offering for the people, and slew it, and offered it for sin, as the first.
    16 And he brought the burnt offering, and offered it according to the manner.
    17 And he brought the meat offering, and took an handful thereof, and burnt it upon the altar, beside the burnt sacrifice of the morning.
    18 He slew also the bullock and the ram for a sacrifice of peace offerings, which was for the people: and Aaron’s sons presented unto him the blood, which he sprinkled upon the altar round about,
    19 And the fat of the bullock and of the ram, the rump, and that which covereth the inwards, and the kidneys, and the caul above the liver:
    20 And they put the fat upon the breasts, and he burnt the fat upon the altar:
    21 And the breasts and the right shoulder Aaron waved for a wave offering before the Lord; as Moses commanded.
    22 And Aaron lifted up his hand toward the people, and blessed them, and came down from offering of the sin offering, and the burnt offering, and peace offerings.
    23 And Moses and Aaron went into the tabernacle of the congregation, and came out, and blessed the people: and the glory of the Lord appeared unto all the people.
    24 And there came a fire out from before the Lord, and consumed upon the altar the burnt offering and the fat: which when all the people saw, they shouted, and fell on their faces.

  • Cassandra

    by the way, there are 5 animals they slaughter in this one part, a kid of a goat, a lamb, and a calf (all baby/young animals) and then also a bullock and a ram.

  • Carlene Wilson

    Thank you for this enlightening information as I am a christian and felt so bad passing up partaking in passover. This diet although is a healthier one (without grain) is not by complete wanting to but needing to in order to live longer as I have celiac. So if it is questioned why I pass on taking the cracker and I get looks I will use this article as a reference.
    Again thank you so much and God Bless!

  • NJC

    Nothing was mentioned here about the processing of meat with hormones and antibiotics. ALL of the food we eat is processed way differently than in Biblical times. The problem is, we’d never eat anything if we knew the chemicals/additives put in each of them. It would be great to grow our own foods and raise your own animals, so we can ensure more purity of our foods but that is not feasible for everyone. One big issue today is our portion sizes and over indulgence of foods, particularly processed foods that are easy to over consume. Sometimes for emotional reasons. Obesity is on the rise and is a serious issue. I generally eat plant based foods with small amounts of lean animal products but it can often not be realistic to do every meal, every day. There are several scriptures I keep in mind related to eating but one good one is 1 Corinthians 10:31.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ashley.layton.7 Ashley Layton

    This is something I have been thinking about a lot lately, as I have found I cannot handle grains. I have lost 30 lbs in the last year from cutting back and eventually removing them from my diet. And I did not eat junk before that. I haven’t eaten HFCS or hydrogenated oils or artificial colors/flavors etc. in years, so it was not just that I got off processed foods and lost weight. It’s that I got off grains, all those healthy whole grains I used to love. Ahh oatmeal.. whole wheat bread with butter.. lots of butter and maybe some honey too…

    Anyhow! A couple other thoughts. Starches are about putting weight on or preventing weight loss in the face of a high work load. It’s why we feed them to livestock. So, in that respect, people living before modern times (and we live in a highly unique time) probably had use even need for them (in sane amounts) because they also worked much harder and needed the carbs to stay in condition. IOW, grain may be a good food, but not a fitting food for all lifestyles. It’s one of the many food options in the world that may be needed in some situations, but not for most Americans and “modernized” nations.

    Another thought. Have you read about the livestock these people kept? They had hoards of goats and sheep and cattle! I expect they ate a lot of meat and dairy. And the fatter the better.

    And lastly, just overeating carbs (in whatever forms) in our sedentary lifestyles (and even many of those who are “active” today are sedentary compared to past generations) has deranged many of our metabolisms so badly that even something that might have been healthy, is not something our body can handle anymore because it’s just plain damaged.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ashley.layton.7 Ashley Layton

    It’s not that grain (the kind they had then, not our wheat today) is inherently bad but bad for US. Why? Because our lifestyles, coupled with a diet inappropriate for that lifestyle, have wrecked most of our metabolic processes. Our diets have been about overeating of foods that are made for movement, without the movement. The vast majority of us here, (since people here have access to a computer we’re not likely living hand to mouth), don’t work near as hard as our ancestors, even just a couple generations back in some instances. Carbs are about putting on weight or keeping up condition in the face of working hard. Grains are a very powerful carb. Most people don’t work hard enough now to need grain’s fattening power. There are many different kinds of food for a reason. Different foods are good for different things. In most of our modern lives, grain is an inappropriate food. However, it was not when Christ was on earth. People lived differently, and the grain was different as well.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ashley.layton.7 Ashley Layton

    I still take the bread at Passover, it is a commandment from Christ. If you are celiac, talk with your pastor about making your own unleavened bread with non gluten grain or some of these older grains mentioned above. Perhaps you could even make the bread for everyone for the ceremony!

  • http://www.facebook.com/ashley.layton.7 Ashley Layton

    Creature is actually creation there. But if we take it to mean what this poster seems to be implying, then we could all live on a lb of sugar alone per day. I don’t think that will work well. All things God gave us are good, but that doesn’t mean they can be misused as we misuse grains today.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ashley.layton.7 Ashley Layton

    There is no old law. It was called an “old covenant”. Law and covenant are not the same thing.

  • Anne

    I appreciate this article, and it’s something I have been researchng and trying to make sense of. But, as a Catholic yourself, I’m presuming that you do believe that Jesus commands us eat bread, as do I. We receive it every Sunday. Why would He choose to come to us in the form of something that a) wasn’t an important part of their/our life, and b) something harmful? Perhaps, as you said, the bread they had then isn’t like the bread we have now, but I have a hard time accepting that wheat was not a very important staple back then, and that Jesus wasn’t literally calling Himself the bread of life.

    At any rate, I greatly appreciate your bog.

  • JacquelineW

    This was extremely helpful to me. I am thinking of transitioning to a more paleo-style diet, and while it seems to be extremely healthy to me, I often wondered about the oft-cited evolutionary basis for it. This was by far the best explanation I have found of the paleo diet from a Christian perspective. Thanks so much!

  • robert

    Semantics…the law was the old covenant. Jesus came to fulfill the law – hence, the old covenant. That is why we have a new covenant.

  • http://twitter.com/annaliesemaree Annaliese Maree

    Very interesting article! I enjoyed it thoroughly. I have just switched to mostly grain-free with the exception of rice and am feeling much better since discovering I have gluten intolerance. In fact I cant even have a single crumb of flour without having a reaction.Although, I am Catholic and receive the Eucharist every Sunday and have never had a reaction to Jesus as the Bread. Just thought you might find that interesting. :-)

  • Allie

    I’m trying to find facts about the sprouting or fermenting of grains in the bible. Where did you find information that they did sprout or soak or fermented their grains in the bible? Thanks.

  • http://wellnessmama.com Wellness Mama

    I’ve found a lot of that by researching the agricultural and cooking practices of the time period for those regions. Also, many of the passages referring to leavened bread are referring to a fermenting process…

  • http://www.facebook.com/chelsea.marvitz Chelsea Leigh Marvitz

    Loved this article! I’ve been digging into paleo for a couple months now and I’m in love. Something that would always be a little uncomfortable for me is that I don’t fully believe in the evolution of man as some hard core primal teachers suggest although I truly believe that paleo is the best way for us to live as shown by the countless studies I’ve researched and the common sense – eat real food, not rocket science. :) I’ve been able to justify the Biblical points the same that you’ve presented here (not same grains, prepared differently, etc) but I was just really encouraged to see a fellow Christian be able to do the same. I’ve even had conversations about faith started because they can’t believe that a Christian can be so science based, especially on the heels of a mostly evolutionary movement.

    I just wanted you to know that I really appreciate your site and what you are doing and as a young christian paleo it is very inspiring to me.

    Thanks!

  • Pingback: There Was an Old Woman Who Swallowed a Fly « Contrast

  • LPatt

    I am a new fan of your blog. It’s refreshing to find a perspective on food and wellness that doesn’t focus on body image simply to fit in with the rest of the “skinny” world. I like finally learning about what the Bible says about food from the context of the writer at the biblical time period which makes so much sense. Looking forward to reading more of your work.

  • Pingback: Top 7 Nutrition Myths: Number 4 | Uncanned Health

  • Pingback: Top 7 Nutrition Myths: Number 3 | Uncanned Health

  • Pingback: Almost-Primal Orthodox Christian Lenten Eating and Cooking - Page 2 | Mark's Daily Apple Health and Fitness Forum page 2

  • http://twitter.com/RecruiterPros Kim Armstrong

    We recently ditched grains, sugar and dairy from our diets based on some food allergies and advice from nutritionists. We also juice veggies and fruit daily, eat grass fed beef and free range eggs…it’s been a process over the past several years. It’s amazing how much better we feel. When you eat something unhealthy (or restaurant food) – you instantly know…..probably shouldn’t have eaten that! :( (
    Just found your website….and made blueberry coconut flour pancakes this morning.
    So excited to try more recipes.
    Really like this article.
    Thanks for sharing!!!

  • Pingback: Bread and The Bible - Page 9 | Mark's Daily Apple Health and Fitness Forum page 9

  • Vicomte13

    Thank you for your article. I have thought about the same issues, and come to some of the same conclusions you have.

    Let’s start with the truth: Jesus made all foods clean for Jews, and the Holy Spirit repeated that. But the Law of Moses, with all of its food restrictions, only EVER applied to Hebrews (and the only Hebrews left after the Babylonian Exile were the Jews). For all of us Gentiles, the only food law that applied after the Flood was the law given to Noah, and that was the diet of Eden: green seed-bearing plants and their fruit, plus milk (never specifically authorized, but Eve had breasts and Abel offered milk (not meat; the word translated “fat” in Genesls is actually the milk of ewes, which makes sense given that God didn’t give meat to eat until AFTER the Flood; also, Abel’s offering is that: a gift, a very different word from the word “sacrifice” that was offered later), plus all of the animals except for animal blood.

    What was noticeably lacking from the diet of Eden, besides meat and eggs, is any vegetables that are not fruit bearing. God said GREEN, SEED-BEARING plants. That would exclude mushrooms, sporangia (ferns that don’t bear fruit), and all seaweeds (they may be green, but produce neither fruit nor seeds and generally reproduce asexually).

    After the Flood, God added animals to what he had already given, so meat and eggs became licit. God never specifically made milk licit, but it can be assumed to have always been licit.

    Mushrooms, seaweeds and ferns are considered kosher by Jewish law, but perhaps they should not be, as they do not fit the terms that God set out for food. On the other hand, Jesus made ALL foods clean. (Of course, “clean” was a Jewish distinction, so in effect Jesus ended kosher. That doesn’t mean that things that were not given as food BECAME food. Truth is, the rule isn’t clear, but truth also is that Jesus said that whatever a man eats passes through him and out into the latrine, and he generally didn’t care about these things.)

    Note too that blood was prohibited to people after Noah, but Jesus commanded men to drink his blood, and said that the wine was his blood. Blood was saved as a food until Jesus, to make the point. Did Jesus make blood, such as blood sausage or blood puddings eaten in the far North, licit food? Probably. The Council of Jerusalem later said “No”, but they did so based on Jewish custom and abhorrence at the thought of eating blood.

    So, with Jesus, truth is we CAN eat anything, but we MUST eat, at least once, the “Body and Blood” of Christ in the form of the bread and wine of the eucharist. Jesus made eating THAT just as imperative as baptism. He said that the bread and wine were his body and blood, and that the man who does not eat it has no life in him.

    So, at least once in our life, we must be baptized and we must take the eucharist. These are non-optional commandments of God. Refuse to do either, and Jesus has said explicitly (and repetitively) that there is no life in you.

    Beyond that, though, thanks to Jesus and the revelation of the Holy Spirit to Peter, food for Christians is completely unlimited from a scriptural perspective. God doesn’t CARE what we eat.

    As far as bread goes, what God actually said to Adam after the Fall was that from now on he would get his bread by the sweat of his brow. That implies that Adam already knew what bread was (God didn’t explain it), which would mean that Adam and Eve not only ate bread, but had fire and cooked food in Eden. So much for the notion that a Raw Paleo diet is the diet of Eden. That’s clearly not true. Adam already knew what bread was; God didn’t explain it, he just said that from then on it would be harder to get, it would require work.

    Likewise, the consequences of the Fall are not necessarily that the world became full of poisonous plants. Remember, Adam was made somewhere, but then placed in Eden, God’s garden. In the GARDEN everything was good and wholesome to eat. After the Fall, Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden. God never said that OUTSIDE of the Garden all of the plants could just be eaten. We should not assume that God didn’t create poison ivy and hemlock before the fall, only that noxious plants weren’t in the Garden for Adam and Eve to worry about. After the Fall, they were expelled from the Garden, and out in a world that probably already had poisonous plants in it. In other words, Genesis does NOT tell us that because of Adam, poisonous plants proliferated in the world. It only tells us that after the Fall, Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden, and that because of the Fall, the ground was cursed for Adam and he’d have to work to get bread.

    You’re right about grains and other foods today being very different from what people ate back then.

    So, the Biblically mandated diet for Christians is: anything you want to eat or drink – everything is licit, including blood pudding, but it’s not all good for us. The only thing you MUST eat, at least once, is the body and blood of Christ, the bread and wine of the eucharist.

    The Bible still does tell us something, though. Between the Fall and the Flood, there were generations of men eating the Diet of Abel: green seed bearing plants and fruits, and sheep milk (at least), and bread of some sort. No eggs. No meat. And if read literally, no mushrooms, no seaweed and no sporangia.

    On that diet (which is actually very close to the diet of the Jains of India), some men lived for over 900 years. Of course, eating that diet doesn’t mean that a man will live 900 years, but all of the men who lived over 900 years ate that diet.

    And that’s an interesting thought.

    What is also interesting is the vegetable diet of Daniel and his companions in Babylon. They only ate vegetables. The Bible doesn’t mention milk (but then, it doesn’t mention it before, but it clearly was licit). If they didn’t at least drink milk, where did they get their Vitamin B-12? The answer would have to be either through insects inadvertently eating with the vegetable. or from the dirty water of that age, or through divine intervention.

    I wonder if it is possible to trust in God to provide Vitamin B-12 through the body and blood of Christ in the eucharist, and not have to otherwise supplement it or eat any animal products. If one takes the Bible absolutely literally and trusts God completely, the answer would have to be yes.

    Peter walked on water. With faith in the real God, all is possible.

  • steve dogan

    To me, the problem isn’t the grains in and of themselves, it’s the way man has to stick his fingers in everything declaring our technology to be better than nature! The grain is not the problem as much as the darn genetic altering, corn syrup, and all the other shhhhhhhugar (AHEM!) you can’t pronounce in food today without a pharmacy degree!

  • Cathy

    Very interesting article! Are all grains gm? Including oats and brown rice? What about what the bible says regarding unclean meats such as pork, and all scavinger fish? I enjoy your blog and I am glad you are a Christian!

  • Pingback: Going Paleo - My Calling IQ

  • Michael Sullivan

    I totally disagree with the article and being a Scientist myself, I feel that you based much of your arguments on bogus health science facts, rather than actual scientific reports. Sure, you have an argument when you are talking about the use of pesticides and chemical agents, but your argument on hybrid plants is totally misguided. Hybrid plants are created simply by cross-breeding two plants to achieve the desired mix of the two. There is no cell or atom splitting or some advanced science involved. Scientific hybridization of plants has been done for ages in both plants and animals. In fact, most of the fruits and vegetables you eat today and probably a hybrid breed. This cross-breeding occurs in nature, but at a much slower pace. Naturally, disease, molds, pests, etc… will strike a certain plant and will eventually leave only the cross-breed plants, allowing it to flourish. Scientific hybridization of plants only speeds that process, so that humans dont lose their food supply. Secondly, there has never been any scientific coorelation between grains and the development of diabetes.Actually, it has been shown in scientific studies that consuming whole grains may actually reduce the risk of diabetes. The fact that grains produce an insulin response by the body (a natural response to eating I remind you) does not mean that it causes diabetes. Should a diabetic limit their grains? Yes! But that is because their body is insulin resistant and no longer capable of metabolizing the sugar in the blood, not because it is the root cause of their disease.