Overprotected Childhood: How Keeping Kids Safe is Actually Harming Them

Katie Wells Avatar

Reading Time: 17 minutes

This post contains affiliate links.

Read my affiliate policy.

overprotected-childhood
Wellness Mama » Blog » Motherhood » Overprotected Childhood: How Keeping Kids Safe is Actually Harming Them

Utah recently passed legislation to “legalize the 80s” and let kids play outside again without fear of CPS being called on the parents. The new law essentially defined the difference between letting kids have independence and parental neglect, protecting the ability for kids to ride bikes and play outside alone.

I shared a video about this on Facebook and got a lot of responses that I didn’t expect. Surely, most parents would be sad that it had to be legislated but glad that kids would be free to play outside more… right?

I was wrong.

Instead I got responses like:

“At least if I helicopter parent, I know my kids are alive,”

and

“Oh great, so now all the pedophiles are just going to move to Utah and have a buffet of children to kidnap,”

or

“That was fine when we were kids but times are different now.”

These responses seem to center on a couple of ideas that I hope to kindly challenge:

  1. Things are inherently less safe in the world today.
  2. The only way to keep children safe is to constantly supervise them.
  3. Supervising children in this way doesn’t have any negative long-term effects.

If you agree with the three points above, I’d implore you to read through this article and consider the actual data!

How Overprotecting Kids is Harming Them

Of everything I’ve written over the years, this is one of the topics I feel the most strongly about because the way we are “protecting” kids is doing them a severe disservice in life.

Instead, I’d propose (and will defend) these counterpoints to the ideas above:

  1. The world is safer than it was when we were kids.
  2. Supervising children at all times does not necessarily keep them safe.
  3. There are long-term negative consequences to overprotecting and over-structuring kids and we are starting to see the results of structuring their lives too much.
  4. Hectic schedules are damaging families and creating more problems.

Don’t agree? Please read on and leave a thoughtful (and kind) comment as to why. But please, not until you read this article to the end…

But… Isn’t Being Safe Important?

Even one child kidnapped or murdered is one child too many… right?

Absolutely, and I’m certainly not arguing that we shouldn’t take measures to keep our children are safe. If life existed in a vacuum and it was simply a matter of a choice between a) the small chance of something bad happening to kids while playing outside; and b) a 0% chance of something bad happening under constant supervision, then my kids wouldn’t be outside climbing trees right now unsupervised while I write this post!

But that isn’t the case. These things don’t exist in a vacuum and the mentality that “I’d still rather keep them safe (inside) than take even the tiny risk that something could happen” has some unintended consequences.

Childhood is More Dangerous Safer for Kids Now

By this statement I don’t just mean because children are less likely to die of childhood illness than in previous centuries. It is statistically safer for kids today that it ever has been in recorded history. Children are less likely to die or be kidnapped than ever before.

Let me repeat that: 

Despite the fear-mongering in the media, children are LESS likely to be abducted, harmed, or murdered than ever before!

Kids Are Less Likely to Die From All Causes

Don’t believe me? Here’s some data from the UN and FBI:

  • Child mortality rates have fallen by over half … since 1990 (United Nations).
  • The homicide rate for kids under 14 is at an all-time low of 1.5 per 100,000 (Bureau of Justice).
  • Meaning, that for a child in the US today, the risk of death from all causes is 1 in 10,000 or 0.01 percent.

In fact, kids are exponentially more likely to die in a car accident while we’re driving them around to various activities than they are to be murdered!

If keeping kids safe is truly the goal, shouldn’t we reduce the number of activities we’re driving them to all the time? By homeschooling, we remove two car trips a day with our kids, statistically reducing their risk of death much more than we would by keeping them inside or supervising them at all times.

Children Are Less Likely to Be Abducted

But most parents aren’t necessarily worried about a child dying. The fear of abduction, disappearing without a trace, or assault are what keep us up at night. But perhaps these things shouldn’t worry us as much either:

  • Missing persons reports have fallen 40% since 1997 while the population has risen 30% (FBI)
  • 96% of these missing persons cases are children who have runaway from home
  • Only 0.1% of actual missing persons cases are what we’d consider actual kidnapping

To put that in perspective, a child has a less than 1 in 300,000 chance of being kidnapped, and most of those cases are by a family member or non-custodial parent.

Since they have a 1 in 3,400 chance of choking to death, it seems we should be much more worried about hot dogs and grapes than letting kids play outside!

But, More Likely to Get in Trouble for Playing Outside

Sadly, laws like the Utah “Free Range” one are needed because the risk of someone calling CPS because a child is playing outside without direct parental supervision is much, much higher than the risk of a child actually getting hurt by doing so.

But Wait… Are Rates Declining Due to Keeping Kids Safer?

I know what you might be thinking…

Obviously these rates are declining precisely because we are keeping kids safer right?

Not exactly.

That would make sense if rates of these crimes were declining only in children. But crime rates are declining in adults too! In fact, crime rates are down to at or below what they were in 1963. Ask your parents (or grandparents) how much they got to play outside in 1963… I’ll wait.

The Free Range Kids Controversy

The Utah “free range parenting bill” was in response to cases where an onlooker called CPS because a child was playing outside, often in his or her own yard. The bill separates the definitions of childhood play and neglect, saying that neglect does not include:

permitting a child, whose basic needs are met and who is of sufficient age and maturity to avoid harm or unreasonable risk of harm, to engage in independent activities.

This means that children are now free to go to and from school by walking, running, or bicycling. They can also walk or bike to nearby stores and parks and play unattended in parks. The law prevents people from calling the police simply because a child is playing outside unsupervised.

If you don’t live in Utah and want to know what the laws are in your state, Lenore at Free Range Kids has a helpful list of laws by state.

What’s going on? Why are laws needed to protect a parent’s ability to decide safe limits for their child without fear of law enforcement getting involved?

I have (just a few) thoughts on that:

Media Over-Attention, Global News, and Fear

The constant media attention and focus on every negative event that happens has wired us to think that our kids are in much more danger than they actually are. Biologically, this makes sense. We’re wired to pay attention to threats to our children. But, the innate protectiveness that we have as parents is distorted by the 24-hour news cycle.

Here’s what I mean:

For most of history, we lived and stayed in relatively small geographic areas without much knowledge of the rest of the world. We knew about problems in our local area only, meaning that we heard about a lot less horrible events on a daily basis. Our brains are wired to pay attention to negative events because they can signal danger. However, since the events we heard about were within our local sphere we also had the ability to problem solve in our local area and help make it safer.

Now, we’re exposed to negative and scary events all the time through the news and social media and our brains haven’t yet adjusted to this change. The result is that our brains can be under the impression that things are really, really, bad and unsafe, when that’s not really the case.

News Makes Us Think Things Are Worse Than They Are

According to an article in Psychology Today, this negative news effect is causing us to believe things are worse than they are. The author reports some observations from a 1997 study on the psychological effect of TV news:

But what was more interesting was the effect that watching negative news had on peoples’ worries. We asked each participant to tell us what their main worry was at the time, and we then asked them to think about this worry during a structured interview. We found that those people who had watched the negative news bulletin spent more time thinking and talking about their worry and were more likely to catastrophise their worry than people in the other two groups. Catastrophizing is when you think about a worry so persistently that you begin to make it seem much worse than it was at the outset and much worse than it is in reality – a tendency to make “mountains out of molehills”!

How an Overprotected Childhood Harms Kids

Here’s a shocking reality:

We won’t always be there to protect our kids or solve their problems. Nor should we be.

Teachers (grade school through college professors) increasingly complain of children’s inability to solve even simple problems on their own. Parents intervene for everything from grades to discipline problems at school because the stakes are so high. But the result is a generation of grown children who still need their parents to decorate their dorms and manage their lives.

I get the desire to keep our kids safe and protected when they are young. But by doing so, are we making things tougher for them when they go out into the world? The answer may be yes.

Thinking about this… there is a 0% chance of children developing street smarts by sitting on the couch watching TV. Kids also aren’t learning problem solving or creativity by being protected from any difficult situations that may arise.

The following are some of the factors we need to consider in the risk/benefit analysis

Kids Are Connecting to Technology More than Nature

Children are spending more time on screens than ever. Recent surveys reveal that children spend half of the time outside that we did as kids. They also spend 56% more time looking at screens than playing outdoors.

On a strictly logical level, this creates problems in several ways:

  1. Sitting and watching a screen is a sedentary activity (and childhood obesity is on the rise).
  2. Eye doctors are seeing increased vision problems in children because of staring at a screen for too long. (Check out this podcast interview for more explanation on this.)
  3. Blue light from screens is affecting kids’ brains and circadian rhythms.

Yet many of us feel safer letting our kids watch TV or browse an iPad than climb a tree or ride a bike.

And scared about the rise of sex trafficking? Children are much more likely to be targeted on social media and later abducted than they are to be grabbed by a random stranger on the street. If this is our area of concern, and it certainly should be, we should be talking about keeping kids safe online and not as worried about keeping them from playing in the backyard.

Kids Need to Be Outside

Outdoor play during childhood serves a much bigger purpose than just being fun for kids. Of course, that is important too, but there are numerous psychological and physical benefits, including:

Fresh Air

Indoor air can be hundreds of times more polluted than outdoor air and spending time outside is a great way to get some clean air.

Vitamin D

Even just a few minutes outside helps kids get the Vitamin D they need for many aspects of health.

Bright Outdoor Light

Outdoor light is much brighter than indoor light and is important for health. Daytime bright light exposure, especially in the morning, helps regulate hormones, cortisol and circadian rhythm. In fact, studies show that it can help improve sleep.

Exercise

It should go without saying, but as childhood obesity skyrockets, kids running around and getting exercise is a really good thing. The average 19 year old is as sedentary as a 60 year old according to a recent Johns Hopkins study.

Sensory Input

I recently interviewed an occupational therapist who is helping correct many of the problems created by kids not playing outside enough. We keep babies upright and in high chairs, cribs and play pens. They don’t play outside in dirt or get sensory input from grass, or crawl and fall down enough. This is linked to more anxiety, lack of creativity, and other problems for older kids. The lack of vestibular system development is also leading to kids being clumsier and not having as much balance.

Angela Hanscom, a pediatric occupational therapist and author of Balanced and Barefoot: How Unrestricted Outdoor Play Makes for Strong, Confident, and Capable Children, explains:

Movement through active free play, especially outside, improves everything from creativity to academic success to emotional stability. Kids who don’t get to do this can have so many issues, from problems with emotional regulation—for example, they cry at the drop of a hat—to trouble holding a pencil, to touching other kids using too much force.

She recommends that children need three hours of outdoor play a day to be healthy. These three hours should not include organized sports or structured activities.

Children Need Unstructured Play

But kids can get all of those benefits even if we’re supervising them. So why let kids play alone?

Here’s why:

Depriving them of opportunities to learn to take control of their own lives affects them psychologically. Think back to times in your childhood that pushed you just beyond your comfort zone. Times when you weren’t sure you could figure out a problem, or master a skill, or even just climb a tree. But then you did. The first time you rode a bike, or climbed a rope or tree?

That feeling of accomplishment is important to kids and we’re often protecting them from it.

Without these experiences, psychologists like Peter Gray argue that we are increasing “the chance that they will suffer from anxiety, depression, and various other mental disorders.”

Hanscom agrees, explaining that:

There’s so much value in kids creating play schemes on their own. Kids who are always told how to play have trouble thinking outside the box, and even answering freeform essay questions. Plus, true outdoor free play is like cross training, with the climbing, spinning, going upside down, and the like that adults don’t encourage but that are so valuable for their development.

Kids Need to Experience Risk & Frustration

Psychologists also increasingly report that today’s kids are terrified of everything from riding the bus to school alone to meeting new people. This is because they haven’t been taught that the world is a mostly safe place or been given the skills to navigate these minor challenges.

We all want to keep our kids from harm, but child psychologist David Elkind explains that sheltering them from every problem and minor injury has lifelong psychological implications.

Kids need to feel badly sometimes. We learn through experience and we learn through bad experiences. Through failure we learn how to cope. There’s a lot to be said for taking risks, making mistakes and learning from them. Something kids won’t have the chance to do if they’re sheltered round the clock. You want your child to embrace, not shy away from the world he inhabits.

Statistically, we’re even afraid to let our kids help as much as they are able in the kitchen. We shelter them from the minor risk of using sharp knives as their skill level permits for fear of a minor cut, and yet, experience is the best teacher in this regard.

Norwegian researcher Ellen Hansen Sandseter found in her research that the relaxed approach to risk-taking and safety actually:

Keeps our children safer by honing their judgment about what they’re capable of. Children are drawn to the things we parents fear: high places, water, wandering far away, dangerous sharp tools. Our instinct is to keep them safe by childproofing their lives. But the most important safety protection you can give a child is to let them take… risks.

And To Experience Getting Feelings Hurt

Another benefit to unstructured play is that parents aren’t there to “rescue” a child any time he or she gets his feelings hurt. I get it, none of us like to see our children feel bad or get their feelings hurt, but they learn from these experiences too.

They learn things like:

  • Not everyone in the world has the same opinion as me, and this is ok and should be respected. (Facebook is still behind on this trend, apparently.)
  • If I am mean to other kids, they won’t want to play with me.
  • I don’t always get to play the game I want or choose the activity at all times.
  • Relationships require the ability to work through minor conflict and compromise.

But when parents jump in to facilitate intensive mediation for every minor infraction, kids don’t get to figure out how to work through frustrations like this on their own.

How We’re Behind the Rest of the World

If the safety data isn’t enough to convince you that perhaps we shelter our kids a little too much, consider the rest of the world. Our kids are going to become adults in a technologically connected world where they will be at a disadvantage compared to their global peers.

While our kids are being shuttled to and from activities and having structured playtime, other children in the world are:

  • Riding the subway to school alone from age 4 (Japan)
  • Biking to school or parks alone from age 4 (Netherlands)
  • Using knives in the kitchen and to whittle sticks by kindergarten (Germany)
  • Climbing trees and playing outside alone from age 3 (Sweden, which has the lowest rate of child injury in the world)
  • Don’t start school until age 7 and have much longer recess when they do (Finland, where children routinely rank among the best in the world academically)

…And More Stressed Than The Rest of the World

Our desire to constantly protect, occupy and enrich our children has led to a lot of stressed out families. I’ve talked to so many parents who are stressed trying to keep up with all of the activities their kids participate in. And the kids are stressed too. Statistics show that anxiety and depression are on the rise in both children and adults. Of course there are many factors involved, but experts think that the hectic schedules many of us keep are part of the culprit.

But, what does the data say?

What Kids Really Need to Thrive

Psychologically, a few factors are really important to a child’s developing brain (and grown-up brains too, for that matter!):

  1. Getting enough sleep
  2. Having down time and unstructured play (not on a screen)
  3. Strong family relationships and a sense of community

Too many extracurricular activities take away from all three of these important factors for childhood development. For this reason, those above factors are my criteria for evaluating any extracurricular activity. Strong family relationships, downtime, and sleep are our top priorities and non-negotiables. Some activities are great, but if they start cutting into family time, down time or sleep, they aren’t worth it to us anymore.

Instituting this policy for evaluating things we add to our life has led to a lot happier kids (and adults). It has also, ironically, led to the kids having more interest in activities and learning them on their own. For instance, music lessons don’t fit into our schedule right now, but my 9-year-old found a book and online course and is teaching herself the ukulele. Our five-year-old is picking up gymnastics/tumbling for fun and cartwheels everywhere. All. Day. Long.

Kids are amazing sponges who can pick up new skills and show incredible creativity when we let them. Let’s give them the space to do it!

What If We Change the Environment & Bring Back Play

Again, I completely understand the desire to make sure our kids are safe. Unfortunately, restricting free play and constantly supervising them has some negative consequences as well. I’d like to propose that as parents, instead of restricting these activities, we work together to create safe ways for them to happen.

In Our Own Homes and Yards

Every location and family has different circumstances, but most of us should be able to find places in our yards or neighborhoods where children can play freely without supervision (or with minimal supervision). We can structure their lives a little less and let them experience boredom (and its fruit: creativity) a little more.

We can hold our tongue and not utter “be careful” every time they climb a tree or jump off something. Or encourage them to just go out and explore nature, ride a bike or climb something.

At our house, we’ve worked to create a backyard that keeps kids active and wanting to play outside. It also fosters free play with space and natural materials for them to build forts and create games to play.

And In Our Communities

Even better? We could choose (when possible) or create places where kids are safe to play on a larger scale. And we can get to know our neighbors to create a bigger area where kids can roam freely. Or we can find like-minded parents and create places and times when kids can just play by themselves.

And we can let go of the (unfounded) fear that if a child plays outside they are at high risk for being abducted or murdered… because the US is safer now that it was when we did all those things as kids.

Practical Steps to Raise Free Range Kids

Hopefully, I’ve convinced you of something that children instinctively know… that they need unsupervised free play to be healthy and happy. But finding time and space to let it happen can be tough, especially in a world where an unsupervised child is taboo.

It’s important to remember that child-directed play is vital to children’s emotional and intellectual development and to prioritize it. According to a 2007 report from the American Academy of Pediatrics ”

some play must remain entirely child driven, with parents either not present or as passive observers, because play builds some of the individual assets children need to develop and remain resilient.

These are ways we can help it happen…

Ask “What’s The Fear?”

Since it is our parental fear keeping kids from playing outside and unsupervised enough, perhaps we should turn our analysis inward. Angela Hanscom suggests that parents ask themselves what the root of the fear is and work to mitigate that without restricting kids from free play.

If the fear is a child being abducted, let the kids play in groups but without supervision. Or work to provide a safe place to play without supervision like a backyard or group of yards, a neighborhood, or even a park where a parent is hands-off and watching from a distance.

If the fear is being hit by a car, let’s teach our kids street smarts instead of keeping them away from all roads. After all, they’ll have to cross streets eventually!

Let Them Be Bored

When I said I was bored as a child, I usually got a response along the lines of “then you haven’t thought of anything interesting to do yet.” But many kids don’t get the chance to become bored these days. The only way this happens is if every moment is not spent bouncing back and forth from school to sports to activities and then to bed. And if every free moment is not spent in front of a screen.

It sounds counterintuitive when trying to create unscheduled play, but schedule time when there isn’t anywhere else to be or anything else to do.

Find a Place for Unstructured Play

Even if it is just the backyard. Or in areas without yards, finding places kids can roam and play. In the UK, there is a wildly popular (among children) adventure playground called “The Land.” It resembles a junkyard more than a playground and kids love it. Local residents created it to give children in a crowded and busy world a place to play and learn.

They start fires, jump on mattresses like trampolines, and build forts using hammers and nails and scrap lumber. They are loosely looked after by non-parent adults known as “playworkers” who don’t intervene but just keep an eye on the fire starting and fort building.

Find Ways to Keep Them Safe While They Play

I’ll admit, it is easier to have peace of mind when letting my kids play without supervision because there are enough of them that they are always in groups. We also live in an amazing neighborhood where many parents are on the same page and there is always a pack of kids roaming the streets together.

For safety, kids can stick together in groups to play or take a dog or a walkie talkie with them.

Teach Them Situational Awareness

This is a key point. I’m not suggesting we send our kids into any and every environment unsupervised. Not by a long shot. They shouldn’t play in parking lots or run around malls at a young age just because they need free play. Common sense is important and so is situational awareness. We need to teach children how to be aware of their surroundings and keep an eye out for actual danger by doing so ourselves.

This also means we have to let go of the fear when there isn’t any real danger so that we will notice when there actually is a problem.

At a basic level, this means teaching kids skills like crossing a street safely and being aware of surroundings (and staying close to us) in crowded places. It is also about teaching them that the world is a generally safe place (because it is) and letting them experience more of it.

Bottom Line: Shouldn’t the Parents Get to Decide?

Certainly, you don’t have to agree with me that your own children should play outside unsupervised. But the data doesn’t back up the idea that they aren’t safe when they do.

But at the end of the day, shouldn’t this decision be up to the judgement of the parents based on their own circumstances and location? Without the more real risk of CPS being called just because children are playing outside like most of us had the freedom to do as kids?

If the whole idea of this post creates a reaction anything along the lines of “parents who let their kids play unsupervised shouldn’t be allowed to be parents,” please consider the actual data and the fact that you’d see parents get in trouble or have their kids taken for something that isn’t actually unsafe!

I’d love to hear your (respectfully voiced) opinion in the comments. My stance is that I’m trying to raise responsible, problem-solving adults and I consider the risk of psychologically dwarfing them by protecting them from even minor problems to be a much bigger concern than the statistically almost nonexistent risk that they’ll be kidnapped if they aren’t supervised at all times.

We all want the best in life for our kids and that is precisely why I make sure my kids have a lot of unsupervised play time outside.

This article was medically reviewed by Madiha Saeed, MD, a board certified family physician. As always, this is not personal medical advice and we recommend that you talk with your doctor.

What do you think? Agree or disagree? Please weigh in below, just keep it kind and avoid personal attacks and name calling, just like we all encourage our kids to do!

Not convinced? These are easy reads and provide more research and practical advice:

Books:

Articles:

Katie Wells Avatar

About Katie Wells

Katie Wells, CTNC, MCHC, Founder of Wellness Mama and Co-founder of Wellnesse, has a background in research, journalism, and nutrition. As a mom of six, she turned to research and took health into her own hands to find answers to her health problems. WellnessMama.com is the culmination of her thousands of hours of research and all posts are medically reviewed and verified by the Wellness Mama research team. Katie is also the author of the bestselling books The Wellness Mama Cookbook and The Wellness Mama 5-Step Lifestyle Detox.

Comments

145 responses to “Overprotected Childhood: How Keeping Kids Safe is Actually Harming Them”

  1. Catherine Avatar
    Catherine

    I grew up in South Florida, pretty much wearing sunsuits and flip flops and spending a lot of time outside. We played in our yard and in the yards of our neighbors. We climbed trees (and fell out of them), rode our bikes (and fell off of them), had cookouts with the neighbors, and my sister and I also played inside together with just each other. One thing not mentioned in the article involves toys. My sister and I had the basics like a Barbie doll and some clothes, etc. but not all the other paraphernalia. So we improvised and we were amazingly resourceful at this! We created an entire Barbie apartment with sofa pillows, milk cartons, coffee cans, flowered hand towels, and paper, etc. (Oh, and our Barbies had careers and this was in the 1960s!) I am now a VERY resourceful person and I thank the lack of having everything and having everything done for me.

    But I think for the great ideas in the article to work, you really do have to have a “neighborhood,” something which seems to be lacking in a lot of areas now. People don’t know their neighbors like they used to so a parent or parents are the sole ones looking after their children. You can’t trust those you don’t know. People with children should think of that when searching for a home.

  2. Nica C Avatar

    I am a momma to two boys and I have extreme anxiety. Having been raised by a helicopter mother, it’s very difficult for me to let go and let them go out and play. I know logically they will be fine, but it’s amazing what the human brain can come up with! My fear is generally injury, we live in a safe neighborhood and I don’t fear abduction. Your article helped me today to let go and let them be kids! They are outside playing in our yard by themselves. I know how important it is but reading this it really hit home how sheltered they are! Thank you for the reminder, I needed to read this!

  3. Erika Avatar

    This has inspired me to start an adventure park in my area! Only 10 in the US is a dismal number and needs to be changed!

  4. Daniela Avatar
    Daniela

    What a fantastic post. Thank you and kudos to you for speaking out about this. I’m truly troubled by the way we “think” kids should be raised these days. I’ve been fortunate to experience independence my whole life which has allowed me to make decisions for myself and go through trial and error.

  5. Anna Avatar

    Wow this is really good! I agree but didn’t have all the stats to back up my gut feeling.

  6. Talaena Avatar
    Talaena

    Thank you for posting such an in-depth article on this subject. I have always known kids need unstructured play but I have had a hard time letting my son play outside without me watching. We live on 5 acres that butts up to a huge green belt. We have seen bear and cougar in the woods which is a bit different than your average kidnapper! All that being said your article still made me think about it. The chances of a bear or cougar wandering into our back yard is not likely. I really do need to let go a little and let him play, at least with boundaries, like not going to far in the woods alone. Thanks again for a great article! I’ll be spending some time indoors this summer watching from a window, surely biting my nails! 🙂

  7. Caroline Reynolds Avatar
    Caroline Reynolds

    Yes, I do agree with you 100%, with the exception of children with special needs like autism, PANDAS, and ADHD. I found that I needed to keep a closer eye on them because their behavior and social skills left something to be desired. Also, the other parents demanded that we police our children (even when I didn’t think it necessary). (I should clarify that our sons are grown now – they were born in the early 1990’s.-Caroline

  8. Anne h Avatar

    I’m actually a fan of this law because it lets parents decide based on their area and their kid. Parents should decide. What I don’t like is the broad brush that paints parents in non-privileged neighborhoods as nervous nellies who are making their kids fat, pale crybabies. That’s just polarizing for no reason. In my area, which is actually considered quite middle class, we are inner ring to a city. Like I mentioned, most of the soil is contaminated with lead from paint (old neighborhood) and nearby industry. Kicking that up as dust, breathing it in and tracking it in on our person is just not a good idea. So we wear shoes and container garden. The park is home to a sizable homeless population and a modest drug trade. Not a place I will let my daughter play alone. That doesn’t mean she’s watching TV all day. We go to the park with her. We let her play alone in the backyard. We teach her self reliance. But no, in an area where many people own guns and have dogs but aren’t great dog owners, I won’t let her play at a neighbor’s house without me unless I vet them. Does that make her fat and lazy and full of herself? No. But that’s why it should be up to parents, because only they know their kid and their area. To suggest that because it is legal to let a kid be off unsupervised means that you’re harming your kid if you don’t is just as bad as saying you can’t be the one to decide.

  9. Terri Avatar

    Thank you Katie for this opportunity to speak.
    I think if we take the “worry” element out of this, we can think more clearly. I raised my children, now adults with an outdoors attitude; what that means to me is: you must go outside everyday and find something that interests you, somehimes with no purpose, yes “no purpose” in touch with nature and the surroundings and neighbors; whats wrong with that? I would check on them periodically but most of the time never let them know I was scoping out the surroundings. Lots of times I would interact with them outside. Please people; if you are constantly thinking that something will happen to them, something most probably will; and they will constantly live in fear.
    To those who are constantly thinking that way, respectfully; I have a question, do you take your child to the doctor everytime there is a slight fever or headache or something else that can be solved at home? If you do, chances are that you are over worrying and underestimating your parenting skills and they will probably pump your child with drugs, harmful vaccines etc. isnt that bad too? so whats the difference? Do you demand that the system take care of your child? If not, and are a little more natural in that respect; but still worry about the neighbors being pedophiles and murderers wouldn’t you think about moving? ? think about it. My opinion: Love them, teach them and watch what happens! ?? Thats my rant, God Bless!

  10. Kathleen Kahl Avatar
    Kathleen Kahl

    Thank you so much for this blog. I will share it wide and far. I don’t have kids but I work with them, all ages. I really see the difference between the way we were raised and this all too common helicopter parenting surrounding the millennial’s . I think the change started in the 80’s. These folks do not grow up and become adults until they reach their 30’s if you are lucky. There is an epidemic of grandparents raising their grandkids because the parents never grew up. We are not raising kids to be independent adults. That never works out well no matter the economic situation. What came out of this is all bad. The massive drug problem is proof enough of the damage (that includes illegal and prescription ).
    As far as your stats I read a story about “media” coverage years ago after 24/7 started. The year of the kidnappings (2002 – Elizabeth Smart) there were NO more kidnappings than any year prior. Same for the summer of shark attacks. No more than any normal season. The controlled media (now owned by only 5 or so giant corporations ) is controlling you. Do yourself a favor and turn them off.

  11. Jenny Avatar

    I love this article. I struggle with letting my kids play outside because we live in a neighborhood with fast cars and people who do not pay attention to kids (because there are no other kids outside). We have a large backyard and I’m feeling more freedom letting my 5 kids (ages 10-2) roam and play without supervision. They drive me nuts when inside my small house and I would love to just let them roam free like I did as a child. Thanks for this encouragement… I will be allowing them to do more.

  12. Annie Avatar

    Katie, this is a wonderful article, and I agree completely. But I am a 63 year old grandmother and I don’t get to make those decisions anymore. I find it sad to watch my granddaughters missing out on being outside and exploring the world. Although my children were allowed to play outside, unsupervised, I feel an extra responsibility to keep my granddaughters safe on my watch. But my husband and I do try to get them outside as much as possible when they’re with us. I do miss the days when kids went out and “called for” their friends and just played. I’m happy I was able to afford my children that opportunity. Thanks, Katie!

  13. Laura Avatar

    Nice article, I do feel children need to be free to play outside and be kids. I completely disagree with your statistics however, I been involved with different branches of law enforcement for almost 20 yrs and what is actually reported and used for the statistics is now where near reality. So the US being safer, I don’t think so and it’s completely dependent on your geographic area. We live in a fairly safe community in GA and our kids play out side with the neighbors but my 15 yr old cannot do the things we used to do as teenagers and have that freedom out in the community. I feel so many parents don’t have this option and it is not safe for their children to be outside alone. I hope your article encourages parents in the areas I’m referring to to look for safe ways to make free play an option in their communities. It is very important.

  14. Courtney Avatar
    Courtney

    I love this article. I have never been a helicopter parent and feel children should do what they are able to do themselves for themselves as far as chores in order to become responsible adults. We are living in a time where you can give responsible kids more freedom and still know they are safe. My 14 year old likes walking and jogging. All I ask is she brings her phone, wears a bright shirt, and lets me know her destination or turn around point or to text me when she gets there. As she gets older she’ll gain more and more freedom. I even allow her to take her younger brother and sister to the park. I remember being younger than her and having an entire country block to roam free on all summer long. It’s great to know the statistics show that crime was even less when I was granted that freedom. Thanks for the article!

  15. Dr. Jim Lewis Avatar
    Dr. Jim Lewis

    Remember that supervising kids for safety (GOOD thing) and helicopter parenting (BAD thing) r NOT the same! Parents going to job interviews with adult kids, or trying to solve college kids’ problems (even at West Point where my daughter is!) Is an all too common problem!

    1. Allie Avatar

      Some people are quick to label others without really know them at all and make great asumptions. And also get confused about what things actually mean and lump them all together. The distinction you made is very important! Thank you stating that! I agree with what you said. Being involved and caring deeply about your children, taking interest, teaching them when they are younger and being available for when they want advice when they are older is a totally different thing than doing everything for your child, not giving them the opportunity to learn and grow, to prepare them for life. Some parents are overly concerned about their children being so “independent” right from birth that they don’t actually parent. Those children can end up more at risk because they were denied the relationships they were intended to have, that should have given them the love and support and preparation for life. It doesn’t always happen, but it’s no wonder than once grown they don’t come around, because there is no relationship to go back to. The world is full of all kinds of people and different ways of parenting. People shouldn’t be so quick to make assumptions and label others and be more careful to see the details.And I don’t believe for one second that things are safer than they ever have been. Statistics are only what is reported and made known. It is not accurate of what actually goes on.

  16. Adrienne Avatar
    Adrienne

    I totally agree with you and see the benefits completely when I let my kids be independent outside. They are SO much happier and are growing more confidence. I wish our community supported this more and I am working on getting more parents on board with this. Would appreciate any advice in this area! Thank you for writing this wonderful post 🙂

  17. Nena Avatar

    I would like to know if you trust this utopic world, why do you home school all your 6 kids? You live in a Utopia state here in the USA? These are the last days we are living, prophetically speaking, in the bible. This is not condusive thinking. You have 6 kids that keep an eye on each other. So that is why you feel this way to write.

    Maternal instincts out with the baby and barh water, America.

    1. Katie - Wellness Mama Avatar

      I don’t think we live in a “utopic world”… far from it in fact. I do think that this way of raising my kids is the best way to prepare them to face the world we do live in… whatever it looks like when they are adults. You are right that with more children I do feel more comfortable letting them play unsupervised because they always have a group around, but we also made a decision to move recently based on finding a neighborhood with a safe environment, a lot of other children and parents who feel the same way about letting kids play outside. Even if I only had one or two children, I’d still feel comfortable letting them play outside unsupervised… especially where I currently live.

    2. Kaleena Avatar

      There are so many reasons people choose to homeschool their children and more often than not it has NOTHING to do with “protecting/sheltering” them. The author’s decision to homeschool her children and her family size are irrelevant.

  18. Dr. Jim Lewis Avatar
    Dr. Jim Lewis

    Bravo! Preach it sister! I am a PhD doing research on resilience growing out of my work in the Army with suicide. LACK of resilience, hence many suicides, comes from the kind of problems u mention that free play helps prevent. Research on problems w too much indoor time, too structured lives, too much screen time is growing. Free play outdoors, even dinging out that getting hurt is not the end of the world, is SO very important!

    1. Samia Avatar

      @Dr. Jim. Lack of resilience can have all kinds of causes. I would suggest that it’s mainly a personality trait a person is born with. You can’t point to one thing that you happen to disagree with and conclude, “Aha! If only the parents hadn’t done THAT, the child would be resilient.” How can you prove this? Anyone with scientific training better be prepared to do so. It is so pitiful to hear grown adults whining to their therapists about how Mom ‘n’ Dad did this wrong and that wrong and oh boo hoo, that’s why I’m messed up (barring abuse, starvation or unusual circumstances).

      While I’m here, are we talking about “free play” or are we talking about lack of supervision? That has not been clarified here. Minimizing indoor time, screen time, structured activities – yes, that’s a fabulous idea. It does not follow that you order the children outside and tell them you don’t want to see them again til suppertime because you’ve bought into the modern version of “free ranging kids”.

      1. Susane Avatar

        LOL. No one had to “order” us outside as kids. That’s where we preferred to be. My mother had no idea where we were or what we were up to and somehow we all managed to live. She knew she’d see us when someone needed a bandaid, at lunchtime, dinnertime and when the streetlights came on. The feeling of freedom and adventure was exquisite.

  19. Anne h Avatar

    I also want to add that supervising kids does not equal overweight children stuck indoors with screens and unable to function. I supervise my kid outside. I limit screen time. She fights her own battles and cooks like a champ. She has downtime and bored time and four-season outdoor free play. Supervised the whole time, but not interferes with.

    1. Melissa Avatar

      This!!! I have one elementary aged child so she is not going to roam our neighborhood all alone. I step back and let her make mistakes then help her learn from those mistakes. I let her have screen time, but I have parental controls on that screen time. She’s only a child once and I want her to be blissfully unaware of adult issues until she’s old enough to process all that goes with that! I am a social worker and know all too well that whether these statistics cited claim “low risk”, I see just how great the consequences of such a low risk are. So none of us are perfect at parenting, but I’m trying my best strike that balance.. but a supervised balance 😉

  20. mary Avatar

    There is much in this article with which I agree, but what if a child has some sort of innate, inborn and biologically-based developmental problem(s), or even a physical or intellectual disability, or emotional and/or behavioral problems, which can and sometimes do necessitate closer supervision and protection of a child? Sometimes, that’s the case.

    1. Suzanne Nelson Avatar
      Suzanne Nelson

      She isn’t saying that everyone should raise their children one way without regard to their individual differences. Every parent should make parenting decisions for their own children and their own circumstances.

      “But at the end of the day, shouldn’t this decision be up to the judgment of the parents based on their own circumstances and location? Without the more real risk of CPS being called just because children are playing outside like most of us had the freedom to do as kids?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *