Does a Pressure Cooker Destroy Nutrients?

Katie Wells Avatar

Reading Time: 4 minutes

This post contains affiliate links.

Read my affiliate policy.

Do pressure cookers destroy nutrients
Wellness Mama » Blog » Natural Home » Does a Pressure Cooker Destroy Nutrients?

Since I wrote about my new favorite kitchen appliance, the Instant Pot pressure cooker, I’ve gotten a  lot of comments and questions about if pressure cooking is a healthy way to cook food or if it destroys nutrients.

It is certainly a logical and valid question… in fact it was the question that kept me from trying a pressure cooker for years until I finally decided to research it, and what I found was fascinating.

Growing up, I considered a pressure cooker an antiquated kitchen tool that elderly relatives used and that was most useful for canning. Some pressure cookers can double as a canner, which is probably why my elderly relatives used their pressure cooker more than those in my generation, but it turns out I had missed out on a lot of important points in my quick judgement!

How Does a Pressure Cooker Work?

A pressure cooker is a pressurized (of course) pot that cooks food using a combination of heat and steam. While it would seem that high heat is required, the steam and pressure actually provide much of the cooking power. A pressure cooker has a valve that seals in the steam, creating a high-pressure environment. This is beneficial because it increases the boiling point of the water or liquid in the pot and forces moisture into the food in the form of steam. Both of these help the food cook much more quickly.

How does this work?

Consider this- water boils at a lower temperature at higher altitudes. This is because the lack of pressure allows the water to boil at a lower temperature. You may have noticed special high-altitude cooking instructions on certain recipes and this is partially why. The lower the temperature at which water boils, the faster foods start to dry out and the more difficult it can be to cook. This is also why it takes longer to cook food at higher altitude.

Pressure cooking essentially does the opposite of altitude, it increases the boiling point of water and decreases the cooking time. Since steam can’t escape from the pressure cooker, you avoid water-loss and are able to cook foods without losing heat.

One big advantage of a pressure cooker is that it can cook foods much more quickly and energy efficiently than other methods like stove top, the oven, or even a slow-cooker.

Does Pressure Cooking Use Really High Heat?

This is where some of the confusion starts to come in. Many people assume that since pressure cooking cuts down the cook time so dramatically, it must use a much higher heat. This isn’t the case at all.

As described above, the shortened cooking time is a product of the increased pressure, not increased temperature at all. When researching, the highest recorded boiling point of water in a pressure cooker I could find was 250 degrees. That is still lower than the temperature that most foods are prepared at in the oven or stove top and about the same as a slow-cooker.

In other words, a pressure cooker may cook foods at a lower temperature than most other cooking methods, utilizing the pressure to improve cooking time and efficiency.

Does a Pressure Cooker Destroy Nutrients?

I completely understand this question, as I had the same one. At first glance, the idea of cooking foods more quickly seems too good to be true and it just seems logical that there is a downside, such as a loss of nutrients.

Fortunately, in researching this question, I found that the reverse is actually true!

Readers have asked if a pressure cooker uses high heat (see above) and if this creates the similar negative effects of high-heat methods like grilling and broiling. Again, it makes sense until we delve into the science of heat and pressure and understand that the increased pressure is what creates the faster cooking environment, not higher heat.

To reiterate, pressure cookers actually cook at a lower temperature than most other methods (steaming, roasting, etc.) but do it more efficiently. All cooking methods reduce nutrients to some degree, but I was surprised how much of a difference the cooking method could make!

In fact, a 1995 study found that pressure cooking preserved nutrients in food more than other cooking methods. Another study measured levels of Vitamin C and B-Vitamins in food and found these levels of vitamin retention (the amount remaining in food after cooking):

  • Boiling reduced nutrients the most with a range of 40-75% retained (up to a 60% loss of nutrients!)
  • Roasting and steaming preserved up to 90% of nutrients (but in some measurements, almost half of nutrients were lost!)
  • Pressure cooking did the best job at preserving nutrients with a 90-95% retention rate

This makes sense when you think about it. Since pressure cooking doesn’t require a much higher temperature and shortens the cooking time, there is less time for nutrient loss. For this reason, pressure cooking may actually preserve nutrients better than other methods of cooking.

There are a couple of notable exceptions to this rule:

Pressure cooking does seem to deactivate certain properties in food like phytic acid. I explained in this post about traditional preparation methods for grains how reducing phytic acid and lectins makes the nutrients in foods like grains and beans more absorbable and less likely to irritate the digestive system. Pressure cooking seems to do a better job of deactivating these substances than other cooking methods.

An Important Caveat

There have been conflicting studies that showed that higher levels of nutrients were lost with pressure cooking, but follow up research revealed that most of the nutrients were actually just transferred to the cooking liquid.

For this reason, I make a conscious effort to use only as much cooking liquid as is needed when using a pressure cooker and to re-use the liquid in the meal by making a gravy, drinkable broth or sauce of some kind.

What Can You Cook?

I’ve personally only experimented with roasts, broth, meats, soups, stews, vegetables and rice in the pressure cooker (this is the one I use), but there are instructions and recipes for cooking virtually everything in a pressure cooker (including cheesecake and hard-boiled eggs!).

Many people love the ability to cook rice or beans in under an hour in a pressure cooker but I love that I can prepare a roast in under an hour!

Pressure Cooking: Bottom Line

Like any method of cooking, pressure cooking does destroy some of the nutrients in food, but it actually preserves more than any other cooking method.

With newer electric pressure cookers (like the Instant Pot), pressure cooking is a convenient and healthy way to get food on the table for your family more quickly and easily while still preserving the nutrients in your food.

Do you use a pressure cooker? What is your favorite way to use it?

Katie Wells Avatar

About Katie Wells

Katie Wells, CTNC, MCHC, Founder of Wellness Mama and Co-founder of Wellnesse, has a background in research, journalism, and nutrition. As a mom of six, she turned to research and took health into her own hands to find answers to her health problems. WellnessMama.com is the culmination of her thousands of hours of research and all posts are medically reviewed and verified by the Wellness Mama research team. Katie is also the author of the bestselling books The Wellness Mama Cookbook and The Wellness Mama 5-Step Lifestyle Detox.

Comments

143 responses to “Does a Pressure Cooker Destroy Nutrients?”

  1. Sharon Ray Avatar
    Sharon Ray

    I am a healthy cook and as per my research, conventional pressure cooker not only damage delicate nutrients with excessive steam pressure and harsh heat, their metal pots also leach toxins into food. I prefer cooking the same recipes in my favorite pure clay pots which take almost the same time and are 100% safe and healthy. I did an alkaline baking soda test to make sure they do not leach.

  2. Alethea Avatar

    Thank you so much for your post! This was everything I needed to answer my questions…i literally had all those questions. So thanks! Wanting to try yogurt and all my friends say Instant pots are the way to go. Going to share a link to this post for them. Thank you! -Alethea

  3. Wendy C Avatar

    I guess my question would be are food molecules cooked by a pressure cooker different from other methods? Does the body recognize these denatured proteins and know how to process them?

  4. Teresa Avatar

    My original question is still unanswered. Does canning bone broth destroy the healthy gelatinous properties?

  5. Jenny Graves Avatar
    Jenny Graves

    Mary, perhaps you don’t understand what denaturing of proteins means? ANY kind of cooking will denature proteins. When you cook an egg by boiling it, for example, it changes the nature of the albumin (denaturing it). There’s no danger to humans in denatured proteins. A pressure cooker is perfectly safe.
    Jenny

  6. Mary Avatar

    I had this same question, Wendy, about potential denaturing of proteins with pressure coking. I don’t know if it was too much past the original post, or just no answer available, or what, but my question didn’t get answered (and I still go on without using a pressure cooker). Good luck in your search for answers.
    Best,
    Mary

    1. Melanie Avatar

      Doesn’t all cooking denature proteins by definition? Since protein structures collapse at 57C (135F), then anything that is cooked is by definition denatured. You could simply warm your beef and chicken to keep the proteins intact, but you wouldn’t be cooking it. Also, don’t forget that stomach acids denature protein as well, although the structures affected are likely to be different. I never understood the problem with denaturing protein: we know that some proteins have enhanced bioavailbility when denatured (cooked): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10564098

  7. Wendy C Avatar

    Thank you for he post. Have you researched on proteins denaturing in pressure cooker? I love my IP, but now I’m doubting about keeping food proteins intact. Thank you.

  8. LindieLee Avatar
    LindieLee

    Brown Rice: When making Brown rice on the stove top I always soak it over night. I just got a new Pressure Cooker and all the recipes I find for brown rice just throw it in the pot with water and cook it under pressure. What do you advise to get the most nutriment out pressure cooking brown rice?

  9. Teresa Avatar

    I make my bone broth old school, many hours on the stove. The last batch I canned and although it was beautifully gelatinous, after I canned it it was not and would not gel. Does canning broth destroy the healthy gelling benefits? Is freezing a better method of storage? I appreciate a response. I hate the thought of loosing the benefit of my work through improper storage. Thank you.

    1. Hilda Avatar

      I pour mine directly into quart jars and let it cool in the jars.You should then get a nice fat layer on top of the jar.Cap it and store in the ref.for up to 2 mths.May keep even longer if the fat is intact but I usually use it up by then.I can also then scrape the animal fat off the top and use it for roast potatoes to make them crispy.

  10. Katie Avatar

    Hi Katie, I have histamine intolerance so anything slow cooked is now out for me. I can’t find anything about how a pressure cooker affects histamine in food, and wondered if you knew? I’d love it if I could eat stews again… Many thanks

  11. Ajay Basu Avatar
    Ajay Basu

    Interesting article regarding the nutritional values during pressure cooking .I really like it. The general misconception has been made crystal clear.Kudos!

  12. Ritu Avatar

    Great post – this thought has been bothering me since i got an Instant Pot.Thank you for researching.
    One of the concerns I have is – the rubber/silicone/plastic …not sure what material – inside of the lid -is it safe ? Is it not emitting anything dangerous ? Traditional pressure cookers (stove top ones) do not have a plastic/rubber inside the lid…

    Also – are we challenging nature by coming up with technology that doing things quicker – food was supposed to be cook with natural fuel – are we going against nature? Not questioning anyone but trying to make sure I am feeding my family healthy stuff –not exposing them to anything harmful by cooking things faster using electricity –going away from traditional methods

  13. Susan Avatar

    I have Kuhn Rikon pressure cookers. I use to use them all the time and after reading your post I will be using them more often. I really like them and feel they are very safe to use.

  14. Alissa Avatar

    Hi Katie, thanks for the fantastic research you do. This blog is one of the first places I stop when doing my own research, and on a topic like this I would have no idea where to start otherwise!
    Just found out that Instant Pot will be released in Australia later this year, yay! All other equivalent products use Teflon.
    Quick question, if pressure cooking preserves nutrients, does that mean slow cooking destroy them? Or are the nutrients also just transferred to the water? I’m also wondering if this is the case for steaming & boiling.

  15. Sally Avatar

    I love my fogor pressure cooker that I got from my bridal shower!! I also use it alot for making food for my beloeved dog. My recipe is follow: few pounds of boneless chicken meat, half to 1 cup of uncooked rice, a set or two of chicken livers, and some chopped carrots with aprox. two cups of water.I usally cooked for 20 mins high pressure. Once, the pressure is release, I then add a handful of frozen peas in. Thats it, i only need to cook this about one a week or so!
    Another dish that I make all the time is braised pork shoulder. What I do is i get a few pounds of boneless pork should, cut them up into big chucks, throw in half an onion, couple of garlics, half a citrus, some oj, some herbs such as clove, cinnamon, cloves, ground cumin, chili power, garlic powder etc. Half an hr to 45 mins later, I got a pot of delicious pull pork for rice, tacos, sandwich etc!!

    1. Hilda Smylie Avatar
      Hilda Smylie

      Thanks for the recipes Sally, I have also been cooking for my 3 scotties but was using the rice cooker for rice and veggies and my Fagor pressure cooker for chicken . I also love my Fagor but after all the comments here I splurged on a 7-1 Instant pot. I will try both of your recipes in that. I guess I really wanted to get the Instant Pot to try the yogurt,plus I wanted to check it out to see if my son and my daughter could use it. Bought one for my son’s birthday and in 2 days he has cooked ribs from the frozen state and a leg of lamb and said they were delicious.I think that means he likes it. I will buy one for my daughter for her birthday.Best thing to have when you work 12 hr. shifts.

  16. Laura P. Avatar
    Laura P.

    Hi Katie,
    I’m really glad to see you get the word out about pressure cooking and its benefits. If someone is interested in eating well – the pressure cooker will get them there.

    I would like to clarify that even though you apply less heat – the lowest possible flame on the burner or less wattage than a slow cooker- in pressure cooking this does not mean that the food is cooking at a lower temperature. As you correctly stated, the boiling point of water is raised during pressure cookery. What that means is that the water in a pressure cooker boils at 240-250°F compared to 212°F.

    Although you can set a slow cooker and oven to temperatures as high as 450°F this does not mean that the food is cooking at that temperature. In fact, that’s why the FDA has minimum temperature recommendations for meats & poultry – for example 160°F for ground meat or 140°F for pork – because setting the oven at 350° does not mean that the pork will COOK at 350°F. In fact, the highest temperature any food can boil, braise or brake without pressure is 212°F at sea level. No matter how much MORE heat you apply to the food, the maximum temperature it can achieve is the boiling point.

    Air is such a poor conductor of heat that it’s used as an insulator. Think of a thermos or cooler. It’s the layer of air that keeps the foods in it hot or cold. Similarly, your oven and slow cooker are filled with air which prevents the heat from the flame or heating element from effectively transferring their heat to the food in them.

    Instead, water is a good conductor of temperature which is why it’s faster to boil than bake potatoes. Or why you could stick your hand in a 212°F oven without a problem but you would get a nasty burn sticking your hand in a pot of boiling water (don’t try this).

    Pressure cooking is an air-free wet cooking method so the food DOES cook at a higher temperatures than conventional boiling, braising and baking. The higher the pressure, the higher the temperature at which the food cooks. Cooking food hotter means it will be ready sooner.

    So if vitamins and minerals are destroyed at high temperatures, why is it that they’re more nutritious when pressure cooked?

    As you mentioned, there are several studies that address nutrition in pressure cookery, and let’s be honest, not all of them say that pressure cooking conserves more nutrients than other cooking methods and they haven’t been done on a large variety of fruits and vegetables, either.

    None of the studies I’ve seen spell out WHY pressure cooking vegetables might be in most cases more nutritious than other methods. The suspicion is that it’s not just the AMOUNT of the heat but the DURATION of it that affects vitamins and minerals. Pressure cooking most veggies takes less than 5 minutes and this flash-cooking of the veggies at high temperatures is most likely the reason they retain so much Vitamin C.

    I’m the author of two cookbooks on pressure cooking and the founder of the Hip Pressure Cooking website. I have also consulted for pressure cooker manufacturers (Instant Pot, Kuhn Rikon, Fagor, Magefesa, WMF and Fissler) and provided them with recipes for their materials to promote pressure cookery.

    Ciao,
    L

  17. Vic Avatar

    You’ve got the temperature bit wrong. Pressure cookers use a higher heat due to the pressure. At high altitudes, water boils at a lower temperature due to the lower pressure. A pressure cooker cooks with a high pressure, so has a higher boiling point, and so the food cooks more quickly.

    Now, because the pressure cooker is sealed, you can use a lower heat setting on your stove to cook on a pressure cooker, but inside the temperature is still higher than in a normal pan. Think of it like putting a lid on a normal pan – you might use full power to boil water without a lid, but put the lid on to trap the heat, and you can turn your stove down, but keep the water boiling at 100 degrees celsius. A pressure cooker is the same, but due to the high pressure, it boils water around 120-130 degrees celcius instead.

    Pressure cooking saves nutrients, but it’s because of the reduced cooking time, and not because it’s cooking the food at a lower temperature. If cooking food with a low temperature was faster than cooking it with a high temperature, low temperature slow cookers would be fast!

    1. Lai Avatar

      Thank you for saying that. I pressure can regularly, and it’s well known that when under pressure, it increases the temperature (which is why you pressure can low acid foods because boiling water isn’t hot enough).

  18. Sharon Avatar

    I love my IP …. it is the foremost helpful kitchen tool I have ….. everything I have cooked from meats, grain, rice, beans, greens, I most not forget cheesecake have been very good….. and as commented above the bone broth I have ever made!!!…. the flavor is the best!!! along with no smell…… I love this article as well….. well written! IP cooks with steam under pressure in short times which is best to preserve nutrients, flavor and saves times…. I wish I had one when I was working long hours to prepare better meals!!! Thank you for writing this post!

  19. David R Avatar

    I’ve been using a pressure cooker for over 30 years, and recently switched to using a steamer. Really I actually prefer using the steamer, although they cook very similar, just seems a little easier.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *